首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Injury Prevention >Traffic calming for the prevention of road traffic injuries: systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Traffic calming for the prevention of road traffic injuries: systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:放松交通以预防道路交通伤害:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: To assess whether area-wide traffic calming schemes can reduce road crash related deaths and injuries. >Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. >Data sources: Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, EMBASE, Sociological Abstracts Science (and social science) citation index, National Technical Information service, Psychlit, Transport Research Information Service, International Road Research Documentation, and Transdoc, and web sites of road safety organisation were searched; experts were contacted, conference proceedings were handsearched, and relevant reference lists were checked. >Inclusion criteria: Randomised controlled trials, and controlled before/after studies of area-wide traffic calming schemes designed to discourage and slow down through traffic on residential roads. >Methods: Data were collected on road user deaths, injuries, and traffic crashes. For each study rate ratios were calculated, the ratio of event rates before and after intervention in the traffic calmed area divided by the corresponding ratio of event rates in the control area, which were pooled to give an overall estimate using a random effects model. >Findings: Sixteen controlled before/after studies met our inclusion criteria. Eight studies reported the number of road user deaths: pooled rate ratio 0.63 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 2.59). Sixteen studies reported the number of injuries (fatal and non-fatal): pooled rate ratio 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.00). All studies were in high income countries. >Conclusion: Area-wide traffic calming in towns and cities has the potential to reduce road traffic injuries. However, further rigorous evaluations of this intervention are needed, especially in low and middle income countries.
机译:>目标:评估整个​​地区的交通管制措施是否可以减少与道路撞车相关的伤亡。 >设计:系统的审查和荟萃分析。 >数据来源: Cochrane伤害小组专业登记册,Cochrane对照试验中央登记册,Medline,EMBASE,社会学摘要科学(和社会科学)引文索引,国家技术信息服务,Psychlit,运输研究信息服务,搜索了国际道路研究文档和Transdoc,以及道路安全组织的网站;联系了专家,搜索了会议记录,并检查了相关参考清单。 >纳入标准:随机对照试验,在研究旨在阻止和减缓居民道路交通通行的全区交通管制计划之前/之后进行的对照。 >方法:收集了有关道路使用者死亡,受伤和交通事故的数据。对于每个研究比率,均需计算出交通平静区域干预前后的事件发生率除以控制区域中相应的事件发生率之比,然后使用随机效应模型对这些事件发生率进行总和估算。 >发现:研究前后有16个对照符合我们的纳入标准。八项研究报告了道路使用者死亡人数:合并比率为0.63(95%置信区间(CI)为0.14至2.59)。十六项研究报告了受伤人数(致命和非致命):合并比率为0.89(95%CI为0.80至1.00)。所有研究均在高收入国家进行。 >结论:城镇中区域性的交通平静有可能减少道路交通伤害。但是,需要对此干预措施进行更严格的评估,尤其是在中低收入国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号