首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry >Prevalence of insulin resistance in first degree relatives of type-2 diabetes mellitus patients: A prospective study in north Indian population
【2h】

Prevalence of insulin resistance in first degree relatives of type-2 diabetes mellitus patients: A prospective study in north Indian population

机译:2型糖尿病患者一级亲属的胰岛素抵抗患病率:北印度人群的一项前瞻性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A total of 172 first degree relatives (FDRs) and 178 controls were included in this study. All the cases and controls were subjected to various anthropometric measurements, fasting and postprandial glucose estimation, fasting insulin measurement and fasting lipid profile. Results revealed the prevalence of Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) (cases 37% Vs controls 11.6%), Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) (cases 34.3% Vs controls 11.2%) and diabetes (cases 11.05% controls 3.37%) was significantly higher in first degree relatives. Insulin resistance was measured using various methods, which included fasting plasma insulin (FPI), Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMAIR), insulin sensitivity index (ISI) (Mffm/l). Prevalence of insulin resistance (Insulin Resistance) as observed comparing FPI and HOMAIR in cases and controls was 43.6% and 11.24% (P=0.005) and 37.8% and 12.47% (P=0.000) respectively. Prevalence of IR (Insulin Resistance) observed in cases having Normal Glucose Tolerance (NGT), Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG), Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) and diabetes mellitus measuring FPI Vs HOMAIR was 37.5% vs 30.2%, 45% vs 40%, 38.98% vs 37.28% and 36.84% vs 31.57% as accordingly. However, ISI (Mffm/l) was not found to be a promising index for IR due to its poor specificity. Though HOMA is taken as gold standard for measurement of IR globally, our study observed fasting plasma insulin representing high sensitivity (89.7%) and specificity (93.3%) as compared to HOMA. Thus FPI had emerged in this work as a simple and reliable test for diagnosing insulin resistance across the population susceptible to develop diabetes including FDRs.
机译:这项研究共包括172名一级亲属(FDR)和178名对照。所有病例和对照者均接受各种人体测量,空腹和餐后血糖评估,空腹胰岛素测量和空腹脂质状况。结果显示,空腹血糖受损(IFG)(37%Vs对照为11.6%),葡萄糖耐量受损(IGT)(34.3%Vs对照11.2%)和糖尿病(11.05%对照3.37%)的患病率显着高于一级亲戚。使用各种方法测量胰岛素抵抗,包括空腹血浆胰岛素(FPI),胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMAIR),胰岛素敏感性指数(ISI)(Mffm / l)。在病例和对照中比较FPI和HOMAIR观察到的胰岛素抵抗(胰岛素抵抗)患病率分别为43.6%和11.24%(P = 0.005)和37.8%和12.47%(P = 0.000)。正常糖耐量(NGT),空腹血糖(IFG)受损,葡萄糖耐量受损(IGT)和糖尿病的FPI与HOMAIR相比,IR(胰岛素抵抗)的患病率分别为37.5%,30.2%,45%和40%分别为38.98%和37.28%和36.84%和31.57%。但是,由于ISI(Mffm / l)的特异性差,因此不是IR的有希望的指标。尽管HOMA被视为全球IR测量的金标准,但我们的研究发现与HOMA相比,空腹血浆胰岛素具有较高的敏感性(89.7%)和特异性(93.3%)。因此,FPI作为一项简单而可靠的测试而出现在这项工作中,用于在易患糖尿病的人群(包括FDR)中诊断胰岛素抵抗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号