首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The International Journal of Angiology : Official Publication of the International College of Angiology Inc >Compression Stockings versus Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Devices in the Management of Occupational Leg Swelling
【2h】

Compression Stockings versus Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Devices in the Management of Occupational Leg Swelling

机译:压力袜与神经肌肉电刺激装置在职业性腿肿的管理中

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Background Occupational edema is reported to occur in healthy individuals after working in a sitting or standing position for extensive periods of time. It can be associated with feelings of tiredness, heaviness of the legs, and pain. Three licensed medical devices were compared in their management of occupational edema. >Subjects and Methods A total of 10 subjects were recruited from a clinical workspace. Right leg volume and great saphenous vein diameter was measured in the morning, and 6 hours later. On subsequent separate days, grade 2 graduated compression stockings (Active Compression Socks, Mediven, United Kingdom), geko (Firstkind Ltd, United Kingdom), and Revitive (Actegy Ltd, United Kingdom) were used bilaterally according to manufacturer's instructions. >Results Leg volumes increased by median 41 mL (p < 0.05) with no intervention. Percentage increase in leg volume was found to be significantly reduced by stockings compared with control (−1.7%, p < 0.01), and were more effective than electrical devices. Changes in vein diameter poorly correlate with leg volume changes. >Conclusion Occupational edema can occur over as little as 6 hours. All devices were well tolerated and reduced leg swelling. Stockings were the only device to significantly reduce leg swelling in this small trial.
机译:>背景据报道,健康的个体在长时间坐着或站着工作后会发生职业性水肿。它可能与疲倦,腿部沉重和疼痛感相关。比较了三种许可的医疗器械在治疗职业性水肿中的作用。 >受试者和方法从临床工作区共招募了10名受试者。早晨和6小时后测量右腿体积和大隐静脉直径。在随后的不同日子中,根据制造商的说明,分别使用了2级刻度的压力袜(英国的Mediven的Active Compression Socks),geko(英国的Firstkind Ltd)和Revitive(英国的Actegy Ltd)。 >结果在没有干预的情况下,腿体积增加了41 mL(p <0.05)。与对照相比,长袜的腿部体积增加百分比明显降低(-1.7%,p <0.01),并且比电子设备更有效。静脉直径的变化与腿部体积变化的相关性很差。 >结论职业性水肿仅需6个小时即可发生。所有器械均耐受良好,并减少了腿部肿胀。在这项小型试验中,长筒袜是唯一可显着减少腿部肿胀的装置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号