首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >Risk stratification and prognostic value of grace and timi risk scores for female patients with non-st segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
【2h】

Risk stratification and prognostic value of grace and timi risk scores for female patients with non-st segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

机译:女性非st段抬高的急性冠脉综合征患者的宽限和蒂米风险评分的风险分层和预后价值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aim: To investigate the value of Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk scores for risk stratification and prognosis in female patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Methods: Non-elderly (<65 years) and elderly (≥65 years) female patients with NSTE-ACS (totally 869 cases) were enrolled in this study. The patients were further divided into low, intermediate and high-risk groups according to their GRACE and TIMI scores. Patients were followed up for 1 year to record the mortality and incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Differences in mortality and MACE incidence between the two scoring systems were compared by the area under the ROC curve. Results: The area under ROC curve corresponding to the mortality and MACE incidence in any period by the GRACE scoring system was significantly larger than the TIMI scoring system in the elderly patients (P<0.05). Mortality and MACE incidence increased in parallel with the scores. Risk ratio values of Cox regression analysis based on GRACE and TIMI scores were greater than 1 (P<0.001). Conclusion: Both GRACE and TIMI were adoptable in clinical risk stratification and prognosis of female patients with NSTE-ACS at different age groups. GRACE showed better accuracy than the TIMI scores.
机译:目的:探讨女性非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)的危险分层和预后的急性冠脉事件(GRACE)和溶栓治疗在心肌梗死(TIMI)风险评分中的价值。方法:本研究纳入了非老年(<65岁)和老年(≥65岁)女性NSTE-ACS患者(共869例)。根据患者的GRACE和TIMI评分将患者进一步分为低,中,高风险组。对患者进行了为期1年的随访,以记录其死亡率和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率。通过ROC曲线下的面积比较两个评分系统之间的死亡率和MACE发生率差异。结果:在老年患者中,GRACE评分系统在任何时期对应于死亡率和MACE发生率的ROC曲线下面积均明显大于TIMI评分系统(P <0.05)。死亡率和MACE发生率与分数同时增加。基于GRACE和TIMI评分的Cox回归分析的风险比值大于1(P <0.001)。结论:GRACE和TIMI均适用于不同年龄段女性NSTE-ACS患者的临床危险分层和预后。 GRACE显示出比TIMI分数更好的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号