首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Microbiome >Communicating the promise risks and ethics of large-scale open space microbiome and metagenome research
【2h】

Communicating the promise risks and ethics of large-scale open space microbiome and metagenome research

机译:交流大规模开放空间微生物组和元基因组研究的前景风险和伦理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The public commonly associates microorganisms with pathogens. This suspicion of microorganisms is understandable, as historically microorganisms have killed more humans than any other agent while remaining largely unknown until the late seventeenth century with the works of van Leeuwenhoek and Kircher. Despite our improved understanding regarding microorganisms, the general public are apt to think of diseases rather than of the majority of harmless or beneficial species that inhabit our bodies and the built and natural environment. As long as microbiome research was confined to labs, the public’s exposure to microbiology was limited. The recent launch of global microbiome surveys, such as the Earth Microbiome Project and MetaSUB (Metagenomics and Metadesign of Subways and Urban Biomes) project, has raised ethical, financial, feasibility, and sustainability concerns as to the public’s level of understanding and potential reaction to the findings, which, done improperly, risk negative implications for ongoing and future investigations, but done correctly, can facilitate a new vision of “smart cities.” To facilitate improved future research, we describe here the major concerns that our discussions with ethics committees, community leaders, and government officials have raised, and we expound on how to address them. We further discuss ethical considerations of microbiome surveys and provide practical recommendations for public engagement.
机译:公众通常将微生物与病原体联系起来。这种对微生物的怀疑是可以理解的,因为从历史上看,微生物杀死的人比其他任何人都多,而直到17世纪晚期,范·吕温霍克和基切尔的著作仍未为人所知。尽管我们对微生物有了更深入的了解,但普通公众还是容易想到疾病,而不是居住在我们的身体和自然环境中的大多数无害或有益物种。只要微生物组研究仅限于实验室,公众对微生物学的接触就会受到限制。最近启动的全球微生物组调查,例如“地球微生物组项目”和“ MetaSUB(地铁和城市生物群落的基因组学和元设计)”项目,引起了公众对公众的理解水平和潜在反应的伦理,财务,可行性和可持续性方面的关注这些发现如果做得不当,可能会给正在进行的调查和未来的调查带来负面影响,但是如果做得正确,可以促进对“智慧城市”的新认识。为了促进更好的未来研究,我们在这里描述与道德委员会,社区领袖和政府官员的讨论中提出的主要关切,并阐述如何解决这些问题。我们将进一步讨论微生物组调查的伦理考虑,并为公众参与提供实用建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号