首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Dentistry >Root ZX Electronic Foramen Locator: An Ex Vivo Study of Its Three Models Precision and Reproducibility
【2h】

Root ZX Electronic Foramen Locator: An Ex Vivo Study of Its Three Models Precision and Reproducibility

机译:Root ZX电子孔定位器:三种型号的精度和可重复性的体外研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although Root ZX is considered the gold standard electronic foramen locator (EFL), two variations of this device were launched, however without different operating mechanisms. This investigation aims to evaluate the precision of Root ZX (RZX), Root ZX II (RII), and Root ZX Mini (RM) EFLs. After access cavity preparation, 32 mandibular single rooted human premolars had their real length measured with the aid of a #15 K-type manual file under magnification (25x). Electronic measurements were performed by the devices in an alternate order until the apical foramen was reached (0.0). Each measurement was performed with adjusted file to the real length of the teeth and verified with a digital caliper. The accuracy of the EFLs was 68.8% (RZX), 65.8% (RII), and 68.8% (RM), considering ±0.5 mm as a margin of tolerance. The mean errors of the devices were 0.37 ± 0.25 mm (RZX), 0.41 ± 0.34 mm (RII), and 0.32 ± 0.28 mm (RM). ANOVA and Tukey test were applied to analyze the obtained data, which showed that there were no statistically significant differences among the locators (P > .05). It can be concluded that the three tested devices demonstrated precise measurements of the real length of the canal without performance differences among them.
机译:尽管Root ZX被认为是黄金标准的电子打孔器(EFL),但该设备推出了两种版本,但没有不同的操作机制。这项研究旨在评估Root ZX(RZX),Root ZX II(RII)和Root ZX Mini(RM)EFL的精度。准备进入腔后,借助#15 K型手动锉在25倍放大下测量32个下颌单根人类前磨牙的真实长度。由设备以交替的顺序进行电子测量,直到达到根尖孔(0.0)。每次测量均使用调整后的锉刀进行到牙齿的真实长度,并用数字卡尺进行验证。 EFL的准确度为68.8%(RZX),65.8%(RII)和68.8%(RM),考虑到±0.5mm的公差范围。器件的平均误差为0.37±0.25 mm(RZX),0.41±0.34 mm(RII)和0.32±0.28 mm(RM)。应用方差分析和Tukey检验对获得的数据进行分析,结果表明,定位器之间没有统计学上的显着差异(P> .05)。可以得出的结论是,这三种被测试的设备显示出对运河实际长度的精确测量,而它们之间没有性能差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号