首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Dentistry >Comparative Resistance of AH26 and a New Sealer Prototype to a Bacterial Challenge
【2h】

Comparative Resistance of AH26 and a New Sealer Prototype to a Bacterial Challenge

机译:AH26和新型封闭剂原型对细菌挑战的比较抗性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective. This study compared the leakage resistance of a New Sealer Prototype (NSP) with a traditional sealer (AH 26) in Resilon-filled roots subjected to a bacterial challenge. Study Design. 41 roots were instrumented to ISO size 50 apically. Group 1 (n = 20) contained Resilon and AH 26 sealer and roots in group 2 (n = 21) contained Resilon and NSP. Roots were embedded in a dual-chamber model with the upper chamber containing Streptococcus mutans inoculum. Evidence of bacterial penetration was observed for 1 month. Fisher's Test was used to analyze the data. Results. 8 of 20 roots (40%) in the AH 26 group demonstrated leakage whereas 3 of 21 roots (14%) in the NSP group leaked. The difference in leakage rates was not statistically significant (P = 0.053). Conclusion. The traditional sealer (AH 26) demonstrated increased leakage rates compared to the New Sealer Prototype (NSP), but the difference did not reach statistical significance in this study.
机译:目的。这项研究在经受细菌挑战的Resilon填充的根中比较了新型封闭剂原型(NSP)和传统封闭剂(AH 26)的抗渗漏性。学习规划。将41个根尖根尖测量到ISO大小50。第1组(n = 20)包含Resilon和AH 26密封剂,第2组(n = 21)的根包含Resilon和NSP。将根嵌入双室模型中,上室包含变形链球菌接种物。观察到细菌渗透1个月的证据。 Fisher检验用于分析数据。结果。 AH 26组的20个根中有8个(40%)渗漏,而NSP组的21个根中有3个(14%)渗漏。泄漏率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.053)。结论。传统封口机(AH 26)与新封口机原型(NSP)相比,泄漏率有所提高,但在这项研究中差异未达到统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号