首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Household Fuel Use for Heating and Cooking and Respiratory Health in a Low-Income South African Coastal Community
【2h】

Household Fuel Use for Heating and Cooking and Respiratory Health in a Low-Income South African Coastal Community

机译:南非沿海低收入社区的家用燃料用于取暖烹饪和呼吸健康

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In low-income communities, non-electric fuel sources are typically the main cause of Household Air Pollution (HAP). In Umlazi, a South African coastal, informal settlement, households use electric- and non-electric (coal, wood, gas, paraffin) energy sources for cooking and heating. The study aimed to determine whether respiratory ill health status varied by fuel type use. Using a questionnaire, respondents reported on a range of socio-demographic characteristics, dwelling type, energy use for cooking and heating as well as respiratory health symptoms. Multivariate Poisson regression was used to obtain the adjusted Odds Ratios (ORs) for the effects of electric and non-electric energy sources on prevalence of respiratory infections considering potential confounding factors. Among the 245 households that participated, Upper Respiratory Tract Infections (URTI, n = 27) were prevalent in respondents who used non-electric sources compared to electric sources for heating and cooking. There were statistically significant effects of non-electric sources for heating (adjusted OR = 3.6, 95% CI (confidence interval): 1.2–10.1, p < 0.05) and cooking (adjusted OR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1–7.9, p < 0.05) on prevalence of URTIs. There was a statistically significant effect of electric sources for heating (adjusted OR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1–6.4, p < 0.05) on prevalence of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections (LRTIs) but no evidence for relations between non-electric sources for heating and LRTIs, and electric or non-electric fuel use type for cooking and LRTIs. Energy switching, mixing or stacking could be common in these households that likely made use of multiple energy sources during a typical month depending on access to and availability of electricity, funds to pay for the energy source as well as other socio-economic or cultural factors. The importance of behaviour and social determinants of health in relation to HAP is emphasized.
机译:在低收入社区中,非电力燃料源通常是导致家庭空气污染(HAP)的主要原因。在南非沿海非正式居住区乌姆拉齐(Umlazi),家庭使用电力和非电力(煤炭,木材,天然气,石蜡)能源进行烹饪和取暖。该研究旨在确定呼吸道健康状况是否因使用燃料类型而异。受访者使用问卷调查了一系列的社会人口统计学特征,居住类型,做饭和取暖的能源消​​耗以及呼吸系统健康症状。考虑到潜在的混杂因素,使用多元Poisson回归获得调整的几率(OR),以了解电和非电能源对呼吸道感染的影响。在参与调查的245户家庭中,与加热和烹饪电源相比,使用非电源的受访者中上呼吸道感染(URTI,n = 27)更为普遍。在统计上,非电源对加热(调整后的OR = 3.6,95%CI(置信区间):1.2–10.1,p <0.05)和烹饪(调整后的OR = 2.9,95%CI:1.1–7.9,有统计学意义), p <0.05)。有统计学意义的加热源(下调OR = 2.7,95%CI:1.1–6.4,p <0.05)对下呼吸道感染(LRTIs)的发生率有影响,但没有证据表明非加热源之间存在关系加热和LRTI,以及用于烹饪和LRTI的电力或非电力燃料类型。在这些家庭中,通常在一个月内可能会使用多种能源,这取决于家庭的能源交换,混合或堆放,具体取决于电力的获取和可用性,用于支付能源的资金以及其他社会经济或文化因素。强调了与HAP相关的行为和健康的社会决定因素的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号