首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >The Disparity in Mental Health Between Two Generations of Internal Migrants (IMs) in China: Evidence from A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study
【2h】

The Disparity in Mental Health Between Two Generations of Internal Migrants (IMs) in China: Evidence from A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study

机译:中国两代移民之间的心理健康差异:来自全国跨部门研究的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Internal migrants (IMs) are a large, vulnerable population in China and are mostly driven by national economic reform. IMs who were born before and after 1980, when the general social and economic reform began to appear in China, are considered to be two separate generations. The generational differences in mental health across IMs remain undocumented. In this study, the intergenerational disparity in IMs’ mental health, using data from a national cross-sectional study, was assessed. Methods: Cross-sectional data from the “National Internal Migrant Dynamic Monitoring Survey 2014” were used. IMs were divided into the “old” or “new” generation, based on their date of birth (before 1980 vs. from 1980 onwards). Mental health includes psychological distress, which was measured using the Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6), and perceived stress, which was measured with the Perceived Stress Scales (PSS-4). Two-level Generalized Linear Mixed Models were performed so as to assess the generation gap and associated factors of each group’s mental health. IM demographics, migration characteristics, and social integration indicators were controlled for when assessing the intergenerational disparity in mental health. Results: A total of 15,999 IMs from eight different cities participated in the survey. New generation migrants accounted for 61.5% (9838/15,999) of the total sample. After controlling for participants’ characteristics, new generation migrants had higher psychological distress scores (βad = 0.084, 95% CI: (0.026,0.193) and higher perceived stress scores (βad = 0.118, 95% CI: 0.029, 0.207) than the older generation. For both generations, factors associated with good mental health included high levels of social integration, personal autonomy, and life satisfaction, as well as self-rated good physical health. For the new generation, the mental health of urban-to-urban IMs (βad = 0.201, 95%CI: 0.009, 0.410) for the K6, βad = 0.241, 95% CI: 0.073, 0.409 for the PSS-4), IMs with a longer migration duration (βad = 0.002, 95% CI: (0.000, 0.003) for the PSS-4) and IMs with a higher annual income (βad = 0.124, 95% CI: (0.029, 0.218) for the K6) was significantly poorer than their counterparts. Conclusions: New-generation migrants’ mental health is worse compared to older IMs. An array of services for addressing these generation-specific needs may facilitate the promotion of mental health among IMs in China.
机译:背景:内部移民(IMs)在中国是一个庞大的弱势群体,主要受国家经济改革的推动。在1980年前后发生的IM,当时中国开始进行全面的社会和经济改革,被认为是两代人。跨IM的心理健康的代际差异仍然没有记录。在这项研究中,通过一项全国性横断面研究的数据,对IM的心理健康的代际差异进行了评估。方法:使用“ 2014年国家内部移民动态监测调查”中的横截面数据。根据即时消息的出生日期(1980年之前与1980年以后),即时消息被分为“旧”一代或“新”一代。心理健康包括心理压力(使用凯斯勒心理压力筛查量表(K6)测量)和感知压力(通过感知压力量表(PSS-4)测量)。进行了两级广义线性混合模型,以评估每一代人心理健康的代沟和相关因素。在评估心理健康的代际差异时,控制了IM的人口统计学,移民特征和社会融合指标。结果:来自八个不同城市的总共15,999个IM参加了调查。新生代移民占总样本的61.5%(9838 / 15,999)。在控制了参与者的特征之后,新一代移民的心理压力得分(βad= 0.084,95%CI:(0.026,0.193))和较高的感知压力得分(βad= 0.118,95%CI:0.029,0.207)。对于两代人来说,与良好的心理健康相关的因素包括高水平的社会融合,个人自主权和生活满意度以及自我评价的良好身体健康。 IM(Kad的IMs(βad= 0.201,95%CI:0.009,0.410),PSS-4的βad= 0.241,95%CI:0.073,0.409),IMs迁移时间更长(βad= 0.002,95%CI :(PSS-4的(0.000,0.003))和年收入较高的IM(β6= 0.124,95%CI:K6的(0.029,0.218))显着低于同行。结论:与年长的IM相比,新一代移民的心理健康状况更差。满足这些特定世代需求的一系列服务可能会促进中国IM中心理健康的促进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号