首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners
【2h】

A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners

机译:在两个口腔扫描仪中使用二维分析进行单齿基台精度评估的新方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to two-dimensionally evaluate deviation errors at five digital cross-sections of single-tooth abutment in regards to data obtained from two intraoral scanners, and to evaluate accuracy of individual scanners. Two intraoral scanners, the Trios 3® (3 Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and EzScan® (Vatech, Hwaseong, Korea), were evaluated by utilizing 13 stone models. The superimposed 3D data files were sectioned into five different planes: buccal-lingual section (BL), mesial-distal section (MD), transverse high section (TH), transverse middle section (TM), and transverse low section (TL). Accuracy comparison between the two scanners in 5 groups was performed. BL vs. MD of each scanner, and three transverse groups (TH, TM, TL) of each scanner were analyzed for accuracy comparison. In comparison of 2-D analyses for two intraoral scanners, Trios 3® showed statistically significant higher accuracy in root mean square (RMS) at BL, TH, and TL (p < 0.05). For each scanner, RMS value showed that mesial-distal sections were more prone to error than buccal-lingual section, which exhibited statistically significant errors (p < 0.05) while the transverse groups did not. Two-dimensional analysis is more insightful than three-dimensional analysis on single-tooth abutment. In mesiodistal areas, rough prepped areas, and sharp edges where scanner accessibility is difficult, high deviation errors are shown.
机译:这项研究的目的是关于从两个口腔内扫描仪获得的数据,二维评估在单齿基台的五个数字横截面上的偏差误差,并评估单个扫描仪的准确性。通过使用13种结石模型评估了两个口腔扫描仪Trios 3 ®(丹麦丹麦哥本哈根3 Shape)和EzScan ®(韩国华城Vatech)。叠加的3D数据文件分为五个不同的平面:颊舌切面(BL),近-远切面(MD),横向高切面(TH),横向中切面(TM)和横向低切面(TL)。进行了5组中的两个扫描仪之间的精度比较。分析每个扫描仪的BL vs. MD和每个扫描仪的三个横向组(TH,TM,TL)以进行准确性比较。与两个口腔内扫描仪的二维分析相比,Trios 3 ®在BL,TH和TL处的均方根(RMS)均具有统计学上显着的较高准确性(p <0.05)。对于每台扫描仪,RMS值均显示,远中切面比颊舌切面更容易出现错误,后者具有统计学上的显着误差(p <0.05),而横向组则没有。二维分析比单齿基台的三维分析更具洞察力。在近中翼区域,粗糙的准备区域以及难以进入扫描仪的锋利边缘,显示出高偏差误差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号