首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Dealing with Ethical Concerns in Suicide Research: A Survey of Australian Researchers
【2h】

Dealing with Ethical Concerns in Suicide Research: A Survey of Australian Researchers

机译:处理自杀研究中的伦理问题:对澳大利亚研究人员的调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Given the increasing trend in suicide mortality and its burden on individuals, families and communities, ethically sound research is crucial to improve the prevention of suicidal behaviour. However, few studies have looked at the experiences of researchers in obtaining ethics approval for their studies. This study addressed this gap by investigating researchers’ experiences in obtaining ethics approval and how they dealt with the concerns raised by ethics committees. Respondents were recruited from September to November 2018 through the Australian Suicide Prevention Research Leaders Network, and 33 respondents (35%) completed the study survey, comprising forced-choice and open-ended questions. Respondents most commonly reported concerns from ethics committees regarding potential harm to participants and researchers’ responsibilities to participants within the context of intervention and evaluation studies. Most researchers modified their ethics application and/or consulted with their ethics committee to reply to the concerns raised. Most respondents perceived the impact of the modification as positive or neutral. The study concludes that researchers may anticipate potential concerns of ethics committees. Improved understanding of how ethics committees work and dialogue between researchers and ethics committees should sustain the quality in suicide-related research.
机译:鉴于自杀死亡率的上升趋势及其给个人,家庭和社区造成的负担,从伦理上讲,合理的研究对于改善预防自杀行为至关重要。但是,很少有研究关注研究人员在获得伦理学认可以进行研究方面的经验。这项研究通过调查研究人员在获得伦理学批准方面的经验以及他们如何处理伦理学委员会提出的担忧来解决这一差距。通过澳大利亚自杀预防研究领导者网络于2018年9月至11月招募了受访者,共有33名受访者(35%)完成了研究调查,其中包括强迫选择和不限成员名额的问题。受访者最常报告说,伦理委员会担心在干预和评估研究的背景下对参与者的潜在伤害以及研究人员对参与者的责任。大多数研究人员修改了自己的道德规范申请和/或咨询了其道德规范委员会以回应所提出的担忧。大多数受访者认为修改的影响是积极的或中性的。研究得出的结论是,研究人员可能会预料到伦理委员会的潜在担忧。对伦理委员会工作方式的进一步了解以及研究人员与伦理委员会之间的对话应保持与自杀有关的研究的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号