【2h】

Annoyance in Response to Vibrations from Railways

机译:应对铁路振动的烦恼

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rail transport is a key stepping stone in the EU’s transport policy and is pinpointed for investment and growth over the coming decades. This expanding infrastructure implies increased exposure to environmental stressors, such as noise and ground-borne vibrations. Little is known about the health impacts of exposure to these vibrations. The aim of this paper is to examine the association between annoyance from rail vibrations and the distance of residential dwelling from the railway. It reports the first results of a large epidemiological study, EpiVib, which was designed to investigate the long-term health effects of exposure to rail vibrations. The first part of this study examines a self-reported questionnaire. In total, 6894 individuals aged between 18 and 80 living within 1 km of a railway in west Sweden participated. Results presented here examine the association between distance to the railway and annoyance from vibrations and are stratified by train type. A positive association between closer distance and increased annoyance is seen. After adjustment for important modifiers, results showed that vibrations from freight trains and maintenance operations are reported to be moderately and highly annoying at distances of up to 400 m from the railway and diesel up to 300 m. Vibration from passenger and fast trains are significantly annoying up to 200 m from the track. Vibration from freight trains and maintenance operations were considered highly annoying up to 300 m from the track, diesel up to 400 m. Vibration from passenger and fast trains are not reported to be highly annoying after adjustment. Heavier, slower moving locomotives, in the form of diesel and freight trains, appear to be the source of annoyance at distances further from the railway compared to passenger and fast trains. This has implications in terms of property, transport, and infrastructure planning.
机译:铁路运输是欧盟运输政策的重要垫脚石,在未来几十年内,投资和增长都被明确指出。不断扩展的基础架构意味着增加了对环境压力的暴露,例如噪声和地面传播的振动。关于这些振动对健康的影响知之甚少。本文的目的是研究铁路振动带来的烦恼与住宅距离铁路的距离之间的关系。它报告了一项大型流行病学研究EpiVib的第一个结果,该研究旨在调查暴露于轨道振动的长期健康影响。本研究的第一部分检查了一份自我报告的问卷。总共有6894名年龄在18至80岁之间的人,他们居住在瑞典西部铁路的1公里范围内。此处给出的结果检查了到铁路的距离与振动带来的烦恼之间的关联,并按火车类型对其进行了分层。可以看出,近距离与烦恼程度呈正相关。在对重要的修正量进行调整后,结果表明,货运列车和维护操作产生的振动在距铁路最远400 m的距离和距柴油最远300 m的距离上中等且非常烦人。客运和快车的振动使距轨道最远200 m变得非常烦人。货运列车和维护操作产生的振动被认为非常烦人,距轨道的最大距离为300 m,柴油最大为400 m。调整后,据报道,旅客列车和快车的振动不会很烦人。与客运和快车相比,以柴油和货运火车形式出现的较重,较慢的机车似乎是烦人的根源。这对财产,运输和基础设施规划都有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号