首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors
【2h】

Hazard Management Dealt by Safety Professionals in Colleges: The Impact of Individual Factors

机译:高校安全专业人员进行的危害管理:个别因素的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Identifying, evaluating, and controlling workplace hazards are important functions of safety professionals (SPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the content and frequency of hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges. The authors also explored the effects of organizational factors/individual factors on SPs’ perception of frequency of hazard management. The researchers conducted survey research to achieve the objective of this study. The researchers mailed questionnaires to 200 SPs in colleges after simple random sampling, then received a total of 144 valid responses (response rate = 72%). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the hazard management scale (HMS) extracted five factors, including physical hazards, biological hazards, social and psychological hazards, ergonomic hazards, and chemical hazards. Moreover, the top 10 hazards that the survey results identified that safety professionals were most likely to deal with (in order of most to least frequent) were: organic solvents, illumination, other chemicals, machinery and equipment, fire and explosion, electricity, noise, specific chemicals, human error, and lifting/carrying. Finally, the results of one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated there were four individual factors that impacted the perceived frequency of hazard management which were of statistical and practical significance: job tenure in the college of employment, type of certification, gender, and overall job tenure. SPs within colleges and industries can now discuss plans revolving around these five areas instead of having to deal with all of the separate hazards.
机译:识别,评估和控制工作场所的危害是安全专业人员(SP)的重要功能。这项研究的目的是调查高校安全专业人员进行危害管理的内容和频率。作者还探讨了组织因素/个人因素对SP危害管理频率感知的影响。研究人员进行了调查研究以达到本研究的目的。研究人员通过简单的随机抽样将问卷调查表邮寄给200个大学的SP,然后总共收到144个有效回复(回复率= 72%)。探索性因素分析表明,危害管理量表(HMS)提取了五个因素,包括物理危害,生物危害,社会和心理危害,人体工程学危害和化学危害。此外,调查结果确定安全专业人员最有可能(按从高到低的顺序)应对的十大危害是:有机溶剂,照明,其他化学品,机械和设备,火灾和爆炸,电,噪声,特定的化学药品,人为错误和起吊/搬运。最后,单向多变量方差分析(MANOVA)的结果表明,影响感知的风险管理频率的因素有四个,这些因素具有统计和实际意义:就业学院的任职期限,认证类型,性别,以及总体工作期限。高校和行业内的SP现在可以讨论围绕这五个领域的计划,而不必处理所有单独的危害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号