首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Evaluating the safety and feasibility of a new surgical treatment for forearm fractures in older children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Evaluating the safety and feasibility of a new surgical treatment for forearm fractures in older children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

机译:评估针对年龄较大的儿童的前臂骨折的新外科手术治疗的安全性和可行性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundBoth-bone forearm fractures are a common fracture, accounting for 3.4% of all paediatric fractures. For now, elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) are the common surgical procedures for paediatric both-bone forearm fractures. Both ORIF and ESIN have their shortcomings. Therefore, we need to find another surgical treatment which can decrease the rate of complications and improve the clinical efficacy. Our study plans to test hybrid fixation, using an ESIN fixation for the radius and an ORIF for the ulna. Our study will conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing double plate fixation with hybrid fixation for treatment of both-bone forearm fractures in older children between 10 and 16 years of age. The objectives of this trial are to compare the effectiveness between double plate fixation and hybrid fixation for treatment of both-bone forearm fractures in older children.
机译:背景前臂骨折均为常见骨折,占所有小儿骨折的3.4%。目前,弹性稳定的髓内钉(ESIN)和切开复位内固定(ORIF)是小儿双骨前臂骨折的常见手术方法。 ORIF和ESIN都有缺点。因此,我们需要寻找另一种可以降低并发症发生率并提高临床疗效的手术治疗方法。我们的研究计划使用ESIN固定半径和尺骨ORIF来测试混合固定。我们的研究将进行一项随机对照试验(RCT),比较双板固定与混合固定治疗10岁至16岁年龄较大儿童的双骨前臂骨折。该试验的目的是比较双板固定和混合固定治疗较大儿童双骨前臂骨折的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号