首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Tamponade dressings versus no tamponade after hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Tamponade dressings versus no tamponade after hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:痔切除术后填塞物敷料与无填塞物:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundSymptomatic hemorrhoids are one of the most common anorectal disorders. Many surgeons use tamponades after open hemorrhoidectomy to manage postoperative bleeding. The question of whether a tamponade is necessary and beneficial after hemorrhoidectomy has not yet been conclusively answered. A previously conducted single-center pilot trial included 100 patients after Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. The data indicated that insertion of an anal tamponade after hemorrhoidectomy does not reduce postoperative bleeding but causes significantly more pain. The findings of this pilot trial are now to be verified by means of a multicenter randomized clinical study called NoTamp.
机译:背景技术有症状的痔疮是最常见的肛门直肠疾病之一。开腹痔切除术后,许多外科医生使用填塞器来处理术后出血。痔疮切除术后填塞是否必要和有益的问题尚未得到结论。先前进行的单中心先导试验包括100例Milligan–Morgan痔切除术后的患者。数据表明,在痔疮切除术后插入肛门填塞并不能减少术后出血,但会明显增加疼痛。现在,该试验性试验的结果将通过名为NoTamp的多中心随机临床研究进行验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号