首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Cost evaluation quality of life and pelvic organ function of three approaches to hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Cost evaluation quality of life and pelvic organ function of three approaches to hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:子宫良性疾病子宫切除术的三种方法的成本评估生活质量和骨盆器官功能:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundHysterectomy is the commonest major gynaecological surgery. Although there are many approaches to hysterectomy, which depend on clinical criteria, certain patients may be eligible to be operated in any of the several available approaches. However, most comparative studies on hysterectomy are between two approaches. There is also a relative absence of data on long-term outcomes on quality of life and pelvic organ function. There is no single study which has considered quality of life, pelvic organ function and cost-effectiveness for the three main types of hysterectomy. Therefore, the objective of this study is to provide evidence on the optimal route of hysterectomy in terms of cost-effectiveness by way of a three-armed randomized control study between non-descent vaginal hysterectomy, total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy.
机译:背景子宫切除术是最常见的主要妇科手术。尽管子宫切除术有很多方法,这取决于临床标准,但某些患者可能有资格采用几种可用方法中的任何一种进行手术。但是,大多数子宫切除术的比较研究是在两种方法之间。相对缺乏关于生活质量和骨盆器官功能的长期结果的数据。没有一项研究考虑了子宫切除术的三种主要类型的生活质量,骨盆器官功能和成本效益。因此,本研究的目的是通过非下降性阴道子宫切除术,全腹腔镜子宫切除术和全腹子宫切除术之间的三臂随机对照研究,就成本效益方面提供最佳子宫切除术的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号