首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Comparison between the standard and a new alternative format of the Summary-of-Findings tables in Cochrane review users: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Comparison between the standard and a new alternative format of the Summary-of-Findings tables in Cochrane review users: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:Cochrane评价用户中标准和新的摘要摘要表格式之间的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundSystematic reviews represent one of the most important tools for knowledge translation but users often struggle with understanding and interpreting their results. GRADE Summary-of-Findings tables have been developed to display results of systematic reviews in a concise and transparent manner. The current format of the Summary-of-Findings tables for presenting risks and quality of evidence improves understanding and assists users with finding key information from the systematic review. However, it has been suggested that additional methods to present risks and display results in the Summary-of-Findings tables are needed.
机译:背景系统评论代表了知识翻译的最重要工具之一,但是用户经常难以理解和解释其结果。 GRADE发现结果表已开发出来,以简洁明了的方式显示系统评价的结果。用于显示风险和证据质量的“发现摘要”表的当前格式可增进理解,并帮助用户从系统评价中查找关键信息。但是,建议使用其他方法来呈现风险并在“结果摘要”表中显示结果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号