首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Molecular Pathology >An audit of splenectomies in a teaching hospital in North India. Are postsplenectomy guidelines being complied with?
【2h】

An audit of splenectomies in a teaching hospital in North India. Are postsplenectomy guidelines being complied with?

机译:对印度北部一家教学医院的脾脏切除术的审核。是否遵守脾切除术指南?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Aims: Patients with an absent or dysfunctional spleen are at risk of infection by encapsulated and other bacteria. Overwhelming postsplenectomy infection (OPSI) causes most concern because it can result in significant mortality. A retrospective review of splenectomised patients in a tertiary care setting over an eight year period was carried out to determine whether current postsplenectomy guidelines were being followed.>Methods: The cases were identified from the medical records and pathology files and data such as the reason for splenectomy, the preventive measures taken regarding vaccination, and antibiotic prophylaxis, together with their documentation in the discharge notes were assessed.>Results: Fifty six patients were studied. Trauma, both blunt and penetrating, was the most common reason for splenectomy. Thirty six patients received pneumococcal vaccination, with 20 patients having no mention of vaccination in their case notes. The discharge notes of 50 patients mentioned their splenectomised status; however, documentation of vaccination details in the discharge summary was poor, with only three patients having the relevant information recorded. Documentation of the need for future vaccination and precautions required in the asplenic condition was also lacking. Nine patients had postsplenectomy complications, although there were no cases of OPSI.>Conclusions: Adherence to standard guidelines for the management of splenectomised patients was unsatisfactory. There is a need for an improvement of the vaccination rate and careful documentation of this important health risk in the discharge summaries. Maintenance of a splenectomy registry could aid in optimising the management of these patients.
机译:>目的:脾脏缺失或功能异常的患者有被包膜细菌和其他细菌感染的风险。压倒性的脾切除术后感染(OPSI)引起了极大的关注,因为它可能导致大量的死亡。回顾性回顾了八年来在三级医疗机构中切除脾脏的患者,以确定是否遵循了当前的脾切除术指南。>方法:从医疗记录和病理学档案中确定病例,并评估了脾切除的原因,疫苗接种的预防措施和抗生素预防等数据,以及出院记录中的文件记录。>结果:研究了56例患者。钝性和穿透性创伤是脾切除的最常见原因。 36例患者接受了肺炎球菌疫苗接种,其中20例患者的病历中未提及疫苗接种。 50例患者的出院记录中提到了他们的脾切除状态。但是,出院总结中的疫苗接种详细信息记录很差,只有三名患者记录了相关信息。还缺乏关于在非临床状态下需要进一步接种疫苗和预防措施的文献记录。尽管没有OPSI病例,但有9例患者发生了脾切除术后并发症。>结论:对脾切除患者的治疗标准指南的遵守情况并不理想。需要提高疫苗接种率,并在出院总结中仔细记录这一重要的健康风险。保留脾切除注册表可以帮助优化这些患者的治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号