首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>CBE Life Sciences Education >Exploring Postsecondary Biology Educators’ Planning for Teaching to Advance Meaningful Education Improvement Initiatives
【2h】

Exploring Postsecondary Biology Educators’ Planning for Teaching to Advance Meaningful Education Improvement Initiatives

机译:探索高等生物学教育者的教学计划以推进有意义的教育改进计划

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper attends to challenges for postsecondary science education improvement initiatives, notably understanding and responding to the realities guiding educators’ teaching practices. We explored 16 postsecondary biology educators’ instructional planning, providing novel insights into why educators select certain strategies over others, including lecturing. Our findings point to an array of factors that educators consider, factors that we believe push against the lecture versus active-learning dichotomy that we hear in some improvement rhetoric. We recommend professional development experiences (including peer evaluations of teaching) wherein educators and other proponents for teaching improvements explicitly explore rationales for teaching, including educators’ considerations of the nature of the discipline (content and concepts and skills and processes) and students’ needs. Educators with less experience with content were more likely to seek out additional instructional resources during planning, including other educators. Given this, teaching improvement proponents may want to offer professional development activities that sync with periodic and planned teaching assignments that take educators out of their disciplinary knowledge comfort zone. Disciplinary colleagues might serve as exemplars of planning and implementing teaching strategies that both convey foundational content and processes and engage students via evidence-based practices.
机译:本文探讨了中学后科学教育改进计划所面临的挑战,尤其是对指导教育工作者教学实践的现实的理解和回应。我们探索了16位中学后生物学教育者的教学计划,从而提供了新颖的见解,说明教育者为何选择某些策略而不是其他策略,包括讲课。我们的发现指出了教育者考虑的一系列因素,我们认为这些因素不利于讲课,而在某些改良言论中我们听到的是主动学习二分法。我们建议专业发展经验(包括对同伴的教学评估),其中教育者和其他支持教学改进的人应明确探索教学的原理,包括教育者对学科性质(内容,概念,技能和过程)以及学生需求的考虑。在内容方面经验较少的教育者,包括其他教育者,在计划过程中更有可能寻求其他教学资源。鉴于此,教学改进的支持者可能希望提供与定期和计划的教学任务同步的专业发展活动,从而使教育工作者脱离学科知识的舒适范围。纪律同事可以作为计划和实施教学策略的典范,既可以传达基础内容和过程,又可以通过循证实践来吸引学生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号