首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>CBE Life Sciences Education >Integrating Concepts in Biology Textbook Increases Learning: Assessment Triangulation Using Concept Inventory Card Sorting and MCAT Instruments Followed by Longitudinal Tracking
【2h】

Integrating Concepts in Biology Textbook Increases Learning: Assessment Triangulation Using Concept Inventory Card Sorting and MCAT Instruments Followed by Longitudinal Tracking

机译:将概念整合到生物学教科书中可以增加学习:使用概念清单卡片分类和MCAT仪器进行评估三角剖分然后进行纵向跟踪

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine the educational impact of an intervention, the inquiry-focused textbook Integrating Concepts in Biology (ICB), when used in a yearlong introductory biology course sequence. Student learning was evaluated using three published instruments: 1) The Biology Concept Inventory probed depth of student mastery of fundamental concepts in organismal and cellular topics when confronting misconceptions as distractors. ICB students had higher gains in all six topic categories (+43% vs. peers overall, p < 0.01). 2) The Biology Card Sorting Task assessed whether students organized biological ideas more superficially, as novices do, or based on deeper concepts, like experts. The frequency with which ICB students connected deep-concept pairs, or triplets, was similar to peers; but deep understanding of structure/function was much higher (for pairs: 77% vs. 25%, p < 0.01). 3) A content-focused Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) posttest compared ICB student content knowledge with that of peers from 15 prior years. Historically, MCAT performance for each semester ranged from 53% to 64%; the ICB cohort scored 62%, in the top quintile. Longitudinal tracking in five upper-level science courses the following year found ICB students outperformed peers in physiology (85% vs. 80%, p < 0.01).
机译:这项研究的目的是研究以干预为目的的教科书,即以探究为重点的教科书《生物学综合概念》(ICB),当用于为期一年的生物学入门课程时。使用三种已发布的工具对学生的学习进行了评估:1)《生物学概念清单》探讨了学生在面对干扰因素的误解时对有机和细胞主题基本概念的掌握程度。 ICB学生在所有六个主题类别中的学习成绩均较高(总体上比同龄人高43%,p <0.01)。 2)生物卡排序任务评估学生是像新手一样,是更肤浅地组织了生物观念,还是像专家一样,根据更深层次的观念进行了组织。 ICB学生连接深概念对或三胞胎的频率与同龄人相似。但是对结构/功能的深入了解要高得多(对:77%比25%,p <0.01)。 3)以内容为中心的医学院入学考试(MCAT)后测比较了ICB学生的内容知识和过去15年的同龄人的知识。从历史上看,每学期的MCAT成绩从53%到64%不等。 ICB同类人群得分最高,达到62%。次年,在五个高级科学课程的纵向跟踪中,ICB学生在生理学方面的表现优于同龄人(85%对80%,p <0.01)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号