首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cardiovascular Diseases >Perioperative Outcomes after On- and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
【2h】

Perioperative Outcomes after On- and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

机译:体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后的围手术期结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although numerous reports describe the results of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at specialized centers and in select patient populations, it remains unclear how off-pump CABG affects real-world patient outcomes. We conducted a large, multicenter observational cohort study of perioperative death and morbidity in on-pump (ON) versus off-pump (OFF) CABG.We reviewed Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program data for all patients (N=65,097) who underwent isolated CABG from October 1997 through April 2011 (intention-to-treat data were available from 2005 onward). The primary outcome was perioperative (30-day or in-hospital) death; the secondary outcomes were perioperative stroke, dialysis dependence, reoperation for bleeding, mechanical circulatory support, myocardial infarction, ventilator support ≥48 hr, and mediastinitis. Propensity scores calculated from age, 17 preoperative risk factors, and year of surgery were used to match 8,911 OFF with 26,733 ON patients.In the complete cohort, compared with the ON patients (n=53,468), the OFF patients (n=11,629) had less perioperative death (2.02% vs 2.53%, P=0.0012) and lower incidences of all morbidities except perioperative myocardial infarction. In the matched cohort, perioperative death did not differ significantly between OFF and ON patients (1.94% vs 2.28%, P=0.06), but the OFF group had lower incidences of all morbidities except for perioperative myocardial infarction and mediastinitis. A subgroup intention-to-treat analysis yielded similar but smaller outcome differences between the ON and OFF groups.Off-pump CABG might be associated with decreased operative morbidity but did not affect operative death, compared with on-pump CABG. Future studies should examine the effect of off-pump CABG on long-term outcomes.
机译:尽管大量报告描述了在专门中心和特定患者人群中进行非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的结果,但仍不清楚非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术如何影响现实患者的预后。我们进行了一项大型的多中心观察队列研究,研究了CABG上泵与非泵下CABG围手术期死亡和发病的关系。我们回顾了所有接受隔离手术的退伍军人事务外科手术质量改善计划数据(N = 65,097) CABG从1997年10月到2011年4月(意图治疗数据可从2005年开始获得)。主要结果是围手术期(30天或住院)死亡。次要结果是围手术期中风,透析依赖,再次手术出血,机械循环支持,心肌梗塞,呼吸机支持≥48小时和纵隔炎。根据年龄,17个术前危险因素和手术年份计算出的倾向得分,将8,911名OFF患者与26,733名ON患者相匹配;在整个队列中,与ON患者(n = 53,468)相比,OFF患者(n = 11,629)围手术期死亡较少(2.02%vs 2.53%,P = 0.0012),除围手术期心肌梗塞外所有疾病的发生率均较低。在配对队列中,OFF组和ON组的围手术期死亡无显着差异(1.94%vs 2.28%,P = 0.06),但OFF组除围手术期心肌梗塞和纵隔炎外,其他所有疾病的发生率均较低。亚组意向治疗分析在ON和OFF组之间产生相似但较小的结局差异。与泵上CABG相比,泵外CABG可能与手术发病率降低相关,但不影响手术死亡。未来的研究应检查非泵CABG对长期结果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号