首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Medical Association Journal >Regulating pharmaceutical advertising: What will work?
【2h】

Regulating pharmaceutical advertising: What will work?

机译:监管药品广告:什么有效?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As Dr. Joel Lexchin makes painfully obvious in this issue (see pages 351 to 356), regulatory processes governing pharmaceutical advertising in Canada and elsewhere are seriously compromised. However, the remedial measures Lexchin proposes are not sufficient. Financial sanctions against improper advertising are likely to be regarded by manufacturers as the cost of doing business, and any regulatory body that includes drug industry representatives or individuals receiving financial support from the drug industry cannot be genuinely independent. Moreover, manufacturers are now using promotional strategies that are particularly difficult to regulate. These include providing drugs at lower than the usual cost to ensure their inclusion in managed-care formularies, and using direct-to-consumer advertising to take advantage of the public's lack of sophistication in interpreting scientific evidence. Our best hope of counteracting the power and influence of the drug industry lies in regulation by government agencies, whose interest is the protection of the public.
机译:正如Joel Lexchin博士在此问题上令人痛苦地显而易见(请参阅第351至356页),加拿大和其他地区的药品广告监管程序受到严重损害。但是,Lexchin提出的补救措施是不够的。制造商可能会将对不当广告的财务制裁视为经营业务的费用,任何包括制药行业代表或获得制药行业财务支持的个人在内的监管机构都不能真正独立。而且,制造商现在正在使用特别难以监管的促销策略。这些措施包括以低于正常成本的价格提供药品,以确保将其纳入管理式医疗处方中;使用直接面向消费者的广告,以利用公众在解释科学证据方面缺乏精巧的优势。抵消药品行业的力量和影响力的最大希望在于政府机构的监管,而政府机构的利益是保护公众。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号