首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine >Diagnostic decision rule for support in clinical assessment of the need for surgical intervention in horses with acute abdominal pain
【2h】

Diagnostic decision rule for support in clinical assessment of the need for surgical intervention in horses with acute abdominal pain

机译:诊断决策规则可支持对患有急性腹痛的马进行手术干预的临床评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A prospective survey of horses with colic referred to a university hospital was undertaken to elaborate on a simple clinical decision support system capable of predicting whether or not horses require surgical intervention. Cases were classified as requiring surgical intervention or not on the basis of intraoperative findings or necropsy reports. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify predictors with the strongest association with treatment needed. The classification and regression tree (CART) methodology was used to combine the variables in a simple classification system. The performance of the elaborated algorithms, as diagnostic instruments, was recorded as test sensitivity and specificity. The CART method generated 5 different classification trees with a similar basic structure consisting of: degree of pain, peritoneal fluid colour, and rectal temperature. The tree, constructed at a prevalence of 15% surgical cases, appeared to be the best proposal made by CART. In this classification tree, further discrimination of cases was obtained by including the findings of rectal examination and packed cell volume. When regarded as a test system, the sensitivity and specificity was 52% and 95%, respectively, corresponding to positive and negative predictive values of 68% and 91%. The variables examined in the present study did not provide a safe clinical decision rule. The classification tree constructed at 15% surgical cases was considered feasible, the proportion of horses incorrectly predicted to be without need of immediate surgery (false negatives) was small, whereas the proportion of horses incorrectly predicted to be in need of immediate surgery (false positives) was large. Some of the false positive horses were amenable to surgical treatment, although these cases did not conform to the strict definition of a surgical case. A less rigorous definition of a surgical case than that used in the present study would lower the percentage of false positives.
机译:对转诊至大学医院的患有绞痛的马进行了前瞻性调查,以详细阐述能够预测马是否需要手术干预的简单临床决策支持系统。根据术中发现或尸检报告,将病例分类为需要手术干预还是不需要手术干预。应用逻辑回归分析来确定与所需治疗最相关的预测因素。分类和回归树(CART)方法用于在简单的分类系统中组合变量。详细的算法作为诊断工具的性能记录为测试的敏感性和特异性。 CART方法生成了5种不同的分类树,它们具有相似的基本结构,包括:疼痛程度,腹膜液颜色和直肠温度。该树的手术率高达15%,似乎是CART提出的最佳建议。在该分类树中,通过包括直肠检查和堆积细胞体积的发现,进一步区分了病例。当作为测试系统时,敏感性和特异性分别为52%和95%,分别对应阳性和阴性预测值68%和91%。在本研究中检查的变量没有提供安全的临床决策规则。在15%的手术病例上构建分类树被认为是可行的,被错误地预测为无需立即手术的马的比例很小(假阴性),而被错误地预测为需要立即手术的马的比例很小(错误阳性) )很大。一些假阳性马适合手术治疗,尽管这些病例与手术病例的严格定义不符。与本研究相比,对手术病例的定义不那么严格将降低假阳性的百分比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号