首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The California Journal of Emergency Medicine >Should Osteopathic Students Applying to Allopathic Emergency MedicinePrograms Take the USMLE Exam?
【2h】

Should Osteopathic Students Applying to Allopathic Emergency MedicinePrograms Take the USMLE Exam?

机译:整骨疗法学生应否申请同种疗法急诊医学程序参加USMLE考试?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionBoard scores are an important aspect of an emergency medicine (EM) residency application. Residency directors use these standardized tests to objectively evaluate an applicant’s potential and help decide whether to interview a candidate. While allopathic (MD) students take the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), osteopathic (DO) students take the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX). It is difficult to compare these scores. Previous literature proposed an equation to predict USMLE based on COMLEX. Recent analyses suggested this may no longer be accurate. DO students applying to allopathic programs frequently ask whether they should take USMLE to overcome this potential disadvantage. The objective of the study is to compare the likelihood to match of DO applicants who reported USMLE to those who did not, and to clarify how important program directors consider it is whether or not an osteopathic applicant reported a USMLE score.
机译:简介董事会分数是急诊医学(EM)居住申请的重要方面。居留主管使用这些标准化测试来客观地评估申请人的潜力,并帮助决定是否面试候选人。顺势疗法(MD)学生参加美国医学许可考试(USMLE),而顺势疗法(DO)学生参加综合性骨病医学许可考试(COMLEX)。很难比较这些分数。先前的文献提出了基于COMLEX的预测USMLE的方程。最近的分析表明这可能不再准确。申请同种疗法计划的学生经常问他们是否应该服用USMLE来克服这种潜在的缺点。该研究的目的是比较报告USMLE的DO申请人与未报告USMLE的DO申请人相匹配的可能性,并阐明计划主管认为这是骨病申请人是否报告USMLE分数的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号