首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine >Havens of Risks or Resources? A Study of Two Latino Neighborhoods in New York City
【2h】

Havens of Risks or Resources? A Study of Two Latino Neighborhoods in New York City

机译:风险或资源的天堂?纽约市两个拉丁裔社区的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Research has been mixed on the potential risks and resources that ethnic enclaves may confer upon residents: whereas some authors characterize racial and ethnic minority neighborhoods through the lens of segregation and risk, others argue that these minority neighborhoods are ethnic enclaves that can improve the availability of resources to residents. In this study, we sought to assess two predominantly Latino New York City neighborhoods (one enclave neighborhood and one comparison) in the areas of structural resources (e.g., grocers, parks), cultural resources (e.g., botanicas, hair salons), and risks (e.g., empty lots, bars) by street-level coding in 20 census tracts (streets N = 202). We used Poisson generalized linear models to assess whether enclave status of a neighborhood predicted the numbers of risks and resources on streets within those neighborhoods. Enclave status did not predict the number of risks (Rate ratio = 1.08(0.83, 1.42), χ2(1, N = 202) = 0.35, p = n. s.) or cultural resources (Rate ratio = 0.87(0.54, 1.40), χ2(1, N = 202) = 0.34, p = n. s.), yet it was associated with a higher number of structural resources (Rate ratio = 1.90(1.48, 2.43), χ2(1, N = 202) = 25.74, p < 0.001). The results suggest that while living in an ethnic enclave may not reduce risks, it may help residents cope with those risks through an increased number of structural resources. These findings support theories that conceptualize ethnic enclaves as neighborhoods where greater resources are available to residents. The focus on resources within this work was instrumental, as no difference would have been found if a solely risk-focused approach had been employed.
机译:关于民族飞地可能给居民带来的潜在风险和资源的研究好坏参半:尽管有些作者通过隔离和风险的视角来描述种族和少数民族聚居区,但另一些人则认为这些少数民族聚居区是可以改善当地居民可获得性的族群。资源给居民。在这项研究中,我们试图在结构资源(例如,杂货店,公园),文化资源(例如,植物学家,美发沙龙)和风险方面评估两个主要为拉丁裔的纽约市社区(一个飞地社区和一个比较)。 (例如,空地,小酒吧)通过20个人口普查区域(街道N == 202)的街道级编码进行编码。我们使用Poisson广义线性模型来评估某个社区的飞地状态是否可以预测这些社区内街道上的风险和资源数量。飞地状态无法预测风险或文化资源(Ratior = 1.08(0.83,1.42),χ 2 (1,N = 202)= 0.35,p = n。s。比率= 0.87(0.54,1.40),χ 2 (1,N = 202)= 0.34,p = n。s。),但它与较多的结构资源相关联(Rate比= 1.90(1.48,2.43),χ 2 (1,N = 202)= 25.74,p <0.001)。结果表明,虽然生活在一个民族聚居地可能无法降低风险,但可以通过增加结构资源的数量来帮助居民应对这些风险。这些发现支持了将民族飞地概念化为居民可获得更多资源的社区的理论。在这项工作中对资源的关注是有帮助的,因为如果采用仅以风险为中心的方法,则不会发现任何差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号