首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Comparison of energy expenditure in adolescents when playing new generation and sedentary computer games: cross sectional study
【2h】

Comparison of energy expenditure in adolescents when playing new generation and sedentary computer games: cross sectional study

机译:玩新一代和久坐的电脑游戏时青少年的能量消耗比较:横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To compare the energy expenditure of adolescents when playing sedentary and new generation active computer games. >Design Cross sectional comparison of four computer games. >Setting Research laboratories. >Participants Six boys and five girls aged 13-15 years. >Procedure Participants were fitted with a monitoring device validated to predict energy expenditure. They played four computer games for 15 minutes each. One of the games was sedentary (XBOX 360) and the other three were active (Wii Sports). >Main outcome measure Predicted energy expenditure, compared using repeated measures analysis of variance. >Results Mean (standard deviation) predicted energy expenditure when playing Wii Sports bowling (190.6 (22.2) kJ/kg/min), tennis (202.5 (31.5) kJ/kg/min), and boxing (198.1 (33.9) kJ/kg/min) was significantly greater than when playing sedentary games (125.5 (13.7) kJ/kg/min) (P<0.001). Predicted energy expenditure was at least 65.1 (95% confidence interval 47.3 to 82.9) kJ/kg/min greater when playing active rather than sedentary games. >Conclusions Playing new generation active computer games uses significantly more energy than playing sedentary computer games but not as much energy as playing the sport itself. The energy used when playing active Wii Sports games was not of high enough intensity to contribute towards the recommended daily amount of exercise in children.
机译:>目标,比较青少年在玩久坐和新一代有源计算机游戏时的能量消耗。 >设计四种计算机游戏的横截面比较。 >设置研究实验室。 >参与者:年龄在13-15岁之间的六个男孩和五个女孩。 >程序:参与者都配备了经验证可预测能源消耗的监测装置。他们分别玩了15分钟的四场电脑游戏。其中一款游戏是久坐的(XBOX 360),另外三款游戏是活跃的(Wii Sports)。 >主要结果指标:使用重复指标方差分析比较预测的能源消耗。 >结果进行Wii Sports保龄球(190.6(22.2)kJ / kg / min),网球(202.5(31.5)kJ / kg / min)和拳击(198.1)时的平均(标准差)预测的能量消耗(33.9)kJ / kg / min)显着大于久坐游戏时(125.5(13.7)kJ / kg / min)(P <0.001)。当玩主动游戏而不是久坐的游戏时,预计的能量消耗至少高出65.1(95%置信区间47.3至82.9)kJ / kg / min。 >结论与玩久坐的电脑游戏相比,玩新一代的活跃电脑游戏所消耗的能量要多得多,但所消耗的能量却不如玩这项运动本身。进行积极的Wii体育游戏时使用的能量强度不够高,无法为儿童建议的每日运动量做出贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号