首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Short term outcome in babies refused perinatal intensive care.
【2h】

Short term outcome in babies refused perinatal intensive care.

机译:婴儿的短期结局拒绝围产期重症监护。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE--To compare the mortality in babies refused admission to a regional perinatal centre with that in babies accepted for intensive care in the centre. DESIGN--Retrospective study with group comparison. SETTING--Based at the Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast, with follow up of patients in all obstetric units in Northern Ireland. PATIENTS--Requests for transfer of 675 babies to the regional perinatal centre (prenatally and postnatally) were made from hospitals in Northern Ireland between January 1984 and December 1986. In all, 343 babies were refused admission to the centre, and complete data were available for 332 of them. These babies were either admitted to other neonatal intensive care units (261 babies) or remained in hospitals with only special care cots (71 babies). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Short term mortality. RESULTS--Seventy of the 332 babies refused admission to the centre died compared with 51 of the 333 who were admitted. Multivariate analysis based on a logistic model showed a non-significant increase in mortality among babies treated in other intensive care units compared with babies treated in the centre (relative odds 1.2; 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 1.9). The increase in mortality in babies who remained in a special care baby unit, however, was significant (3.5; 1.7 to 7.0). This increase was particularly significant in babies born at less than or equal to 32 weeks' gestation and who weighed less than 1500 g (8.4; 2.5 to 28.1). CONCLUSIONS--The results of the study confirm the benefits of neonatal intensive care and its particular value in improving survival in babies of low birth weight. As the babies were refused admission to the regional perinatal centre because intensive care cots were not available this deficiency should be corrected.
机译:目的-为了比较拒绝进入区域围产期中心的婴儿的死亡率与该中心接受重症监护的婴儿的死亡率。设计-具有小组比较的回顾性研究。地点-设在贝尔法斯特皇家妇产医院,对北爱尔兰所有产科患者进行随访。患者-1984年1月至1986年12月间,北爱尔兰的医院提出将675名婴儿转移到地区围产期中心(产前和产后)的请求。总共有343名婴儿被拒绝进入该中心,并且可以获得完整的数据为其中的332个。这些婴儿要么被送往其他新生儿重症监护病房(261婴儿),要么被留在医院,仅带特殊护理婴儿床(71婴儿)。主要观察指标-短期死亡率。结果-拒绝入院的332名婴儿中有70名死亡,而333名入院的婴儿中有51名死亡。基于逻辑模型的多变量分析显示,与在中心接受治疗的婴儿相比,在其他重症监护室接受治疗的婴儿死亡率没有显着增加(相对几率1.2; 95%置信区间0.7至1.9)。然而,留在特殊护理婴儿病房中的婴儿死亡率却有显着提高(3.5; 1.7至7.0)。对于小于或等于32周胎的体重小于1500 g的婴儿,这种增加尤为明显(8.4; 2.5至28.1)。结论-研究结果证实了新生儿重症监护的益处及其在改善低出生体重婴儿生存方面的特殊价值。由于婴儿没有重症监护婴儿床而被拒绝进入区域围产期中心,因此应纠正这一缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号