首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomised trials
【2h】

Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomised trials

机译:选择性环氧合酶2抑制剂和传统的非甾体类抗炎药会增加动脉粥样硬化血栓形成的风险吗?随机试验的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To assess the effects of selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX 2) inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the risk of vascular events.>Design Meta-analysis of published and unpublished tabular data from randomised trials, with indirect estimation of the effects of traditional NSAIDs.>Data sources Medline and Embase (January 1966 to April 2005); Food and Drug Administration records; and data on file from Novartis, Pfizer, and Merck.>Review methods Eligible studies were randomised trials that included a comparison of a selective COX 2 inhibitor versus placebo or a selective COX 2 inhibitor versus a traditional NSAID, of at least four weeks' duration, with information on serious vascular events (defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death). Individual investigators and manufacturers provided information on the number of patients randomised, numbers of vascular events, and the person time of follow-up for each randomised group.>Results In placebo comparisons, allocation to a selective COX 2 inhibitor was associated with a 42% relative increase in the incidence of serious vascular events (1.2%/year v 0.9%/year; rate ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.78; P = 0.003), with no significant heterogeneity among the different selective COX 2 inhibitors. This was chiefly attributable to an increased risk of myocardial infarction (0.6%/year v 0.3%/year; 1.86, 1.33 to 2.59; P = 0.0003), with little apparent difference in other vascular outcomes. Among trials of at least one year's duration (mean 2.7 years), the rate ratio for vascular events was 1.45 (1.12 to 1.89; P = 0.005). Overall, the incidence of serious vascular events was similar between a selective COX 2 inhibitor and any traditional NSAID (1.0%/year v 0.9%/year; 1.16, 0.97 to 1.38; P = 0.1). However, statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.001) was found between trials of a selective COX 2 inhibitor versus naproxen (1.57, 1.21 to 2.03) and of a selective COX 2 inhibitor versus non-naproxen NSAIDs (0.88, 0.69 to 1.12). The summary rate ratio for vascular events, compared with placebo, was 0.92 (0.67 to 1.26) for naproxen, 1.51 (0.96 to 2.37) for ibuprofen, and 1.63 (1.12 to 2.37) for diclofenac.>Conclusions Selective COX 2 inhibitors are associated with a moderate increase in the risk of vascular events, as are high dose regimens of ibuprofen and diclofenac, but high dose naproxen is not associated with such an excess.
机译:>目的:评估选择性环氧化酶2(COX 2)抑制剂和传统非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)对血管事件风险的影响。>设计数据来源 Medline and Embase(1966年1月至2005年4月),对来自随机试验的已发表和未发表的表格数据进行了荟萃分析,并间接估计了传统NSAID的疗效。食品和药物管理局记录; >审查方法符合条件的研究是随机试验,其中包括选择性COX 2抑制剂与安慰剂或选择性COX 2抑制剂与传统NSAID的比较。至少持续四个星期,并提供有关严重血管事件(定义为心肌梗塞,中风或血管死亡)的信息。个体研究者和制造商提供了有关随机分组的患者数量,血管事件数量以及每个随机分组的随访时间的信息。>结果在安慰剂比较中,分配给选择性COX 2抑制剂与严重血管事件的发生率相对增加42%有关(1.2%/年v 0.9%/年;比率1.42,95%置信区间1.13至1.78; P = 0.003),各组之间无明显异质性选择性COX 2抑制剂。这主要归因于心肌梗塞风险的增加(0.6%/年v 0.3%/年; 1.86,1.33至2.59; P = 0.0003),其他血管结局几乎没有明显差异。在为期至少一年(平均2.7年)的试验中,血管事件的发生比率为1.45(1.12至1.89; P = 0.005)。总体而言,选择性COX 2抑制剂与任何传统的NSAID发生严重血管事件的发生率相似(1.0%/年v 0.9%/年; 1.16,0.97至1.38; P = 0.1)。然而,在选择性COX 2抑制剂与萘普生(1.57,1.21至2.03)和选择性COX 2抑制剂与非萘普生NSAIDs(0.88,0.69至1.12)的试验之间发现统计学异质性(P = 0.001)。与安慰剂相比,萘普生的血管事件总发生率比为0.92(0.67至1.26),布洛芬为1.51(0.96至2.37),双氯芬酸为1.63(1.12至2.37)。>结论 COX 2抑制剂与血管事件风险的适度增加相关,如布洛芬和双氯芬酸的高剂量方案也一样,但高剂量萘普生与此类过量无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号