首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Effect of exercise referral schemes in primary care on physical activity and improving health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Effect of exercise referral schemes in primary care on physical activity and improving health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:运动转诊计划在初级保健中对身体活动和改善健康结果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To assess the impact of exercise referral schemes on physical activity and health outcomes.>Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.>Data sources Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and ongoing trial registries up to October 2009. We also checked study references.>Study selection Design: randomised controlled trials or non-randomised controlled (cluster or individual) studies published in peer review journals. Population: sedentary individuals with or without medical diagnosis. Exercise referral schemes defined as: clear referrals by primary care professionals to third party service providers to increase physical activity or exercise, physical activity or exercise programmes tailored to individuals, and initial assessment and monitoring throughout programmes. Comparators: usual care, no intervention, or alternative exercise referral schemes. >Results Eight randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, comparing exercise referral schemes with usual care (six trials), alternative physical activity intervention (two), and an exercise referral scheme plus a self determination theory intervention (one). Compared with usual care, follow-up data for exercise referral schemes showed an increased number of participants who achieved 90-150 minutes of physical activity of at least moderate intensity per week (pooled relative risk 1.16, 95% confidence intervals 1.03 to 1.30) and a reduced level of depression (pooled standardised mean difference −0.82, −1.28 to −0.35). Evidence of a between group difference in physical activity of moderate or vigorous intensity or in other health outcomes was inconsistent at follow-up. We did not find any difference in outcomes between exercise referral schemes and the other two comparator groups. None of the included trials separately reported outcomes in individuals with specific medical diagnoses.>Substantial heterogeneity in the quality and nature of the exercise referral schemes across studies might have contributed to the inconsistency in outcome findings.>Conclusions Considerable uncertainty remains as to the effectiveness of exercise referral schemes for increasing physical activity, fitness, or health indicators, or whether they are an efficient use of resources for sedentary people with or without a medical diagnosis.
机译:>目的以评估运动推荐方案对身体活动和健康结果的影响。>设计系统评价和荟萃分析。>数据来源 Medline,Embase ,PsycINFO,Cochrane图书馆,ISI Web of Science,SPORTDiscus和进行中的试验注册表(截止到2009年10月)。我们还检查了研究参考。>研究选择设计:随机对照试验或非随机对照试验(集群或个人)研究发表在同行评审期刊上。人群:久坐的有或没有医学诊断的人。锻炼转诊计划定义为:初级保健专业人员明确转介给第三方服务提供商,以增加身体活动或锻炼,针对个人量身定制的身体活动或锻炼计划,并对整个计划进行初步评估和监控。比较者:日常护理,无干预或其他锻炼转诊方案。 >结果八项随机对照试验符合纳入标准,将运动转诊方案与常规护理进行比较(六项试验),替代性体育锻炼干预(两项),运动转诊方案加自我确定理论干预(一项)。 )。与常规护理相比,运动咨询计划的后续数据显示,参加了90-150分钟每周至少中等强度的体育锻炼的参与者数量有所增加(合并相对危险度1.16,95%置信区间1.03至1.30),并且降低的抑郁水平(合并的标准化平均差异-0.82,-1.28至-0.35)。在随访中,中等强度或剧烈强度的身体活动或其他健康结局之间存在群体差异的证据是不一致的。我们没有发现锻炼转诊计划与其他两个比较组之间的结果有任何差异。所纳入的试验均未单独报告具有特定医学诊断的患者的结局。> 研究之间运动推荐方案的质量和性质存在很大异质性,可能导致结局结果不一致。>结论对于提高身体活动,健身或健康指标的运动推荐计划的有效性,或者对于有或没有医学诊断的久坐的人,这些推荐是否有效地利用了资源,仍然存在很大的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号