首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Pharmacology >The Role of General and Selective Task Instructions on Students’ Processing of Multiple Conflicting Documents
【2h】

The Role of General and Selective Task Instructions on Students’ Processing of Multiple Conflicting Documents

机译:通用和选择性任务说明在学生处理多个冲突文档中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study was designed to test the role of general and selective task instructions when processing documents, which vary as regards trustworthiness and position toward a conflicting topic. With selective task instructions, we refer to concrete guidelines as how to read the texts and how to select appropriate documents and contents, in contrast to general task instructions. Sixty-one secondary school students were presented with four different conflicting documents in an electronic learning environment and were told to write an essay based on the information from the texts. Only half of the students were told to only use information from two out of the four texts to write their essay (i.e., selective condition). As predicted, students told to focus on specific documents and not use all of them for the assigned task (i.e., selective condition) better discriminated the quality of documents and type of information for the task.
机译:本研究旨在测试处理文档时一般任务和选择性任务指令的作用,这些任务在信度和对冲突主题的立场方面有所不同。与一般任务说明相比,对于选择性任务说明,我们将具体指南视为如何阅读文本以及如何选择适当的文档和内容。在电子学习环境中,向61名中学生提供了四个不同的冲突文档,并被要求根据文本中的信息撰写一篇论文。仅有一半的学生被告知只能使用四篇课文中的两篇来撰写论文(即选择条件)。如预料的那样,学生被告知要专注于特定文档,而不是将所有文档都用于分配的任务(即选择性条件),从而更好地区分文档的质量和任务信息的类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号