首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Industrial Medicine >Animal production and wheeze in the Agricultural Health Study: interactions with atopy asthma and smoking
【2h】

Animal production and wheeze in the Agricultural Health Study: interactions with atopy asthma and smoking

机译:农业健康研究中的动物生产和喘息:与特应性疾病哮喘和吸烟的相互作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Aims: To investigate the role of animal exposures and wheeze, and to assess whether their impact differs among susceptible subgroups, including atopics, asthmatics, and smokers. >Methods: Using the Agricultural Health Study, a cohort of pesticide applicators in Iowa and North Carolina enrolled in 1994–97, wheeze associated with animal production was evaluated and interactions among susceptible subgroups assessed. Logistic regression models were used to examine risk factors for wheeze in the past year among 20 468 farmers. >Results: Individuals raising animals requiring direct contact had the highest odds ratios (OR) for wheeze (ORdairy = 1.26; OReggs = 1.70). A significant dose response was observed for both the number of poultry and the number of livestock on the farm. Farmers who performed veterinary procedures on a daily basis had an OR of 1.51. The odds of wheeze associated with poultry production was greater among atopic than non-atopic individuals. Milking cows daily increased the odds of wheeze in all individuals, with the largest association observed among atopic asthmatic individuals. The impact of dairy, poultry, and egg production varied among smoking groups. Past smokers had the highest odds ratios, followed by never smokers, and then current smokers. The OReggs was 2.88 among past smokers but only 1.46 for never smokers. The OReggs for current smokers of 0.80 might reflect self selection of exposure among smokers. >Conclusions: Results are consistent with animal production and respiratory symptoms, and suggest that subgroups may respond differently to exposure.
机译:>目标:调查动物暴露和喘息的作用,并评估其影响在特应性,哮喘和吸烟者等易感亚组之间是否存在差异。 >方法:使用“农业健康研究”(1994-97年在爱荷华州和北卡罗来纳州)招募的一组农药施用者,评估了与动物生产相关的喘息并评估了易感亚组之间的相互作用。使用Logistic回归模型检查了20468名农民中去年患喘息的风险因素。 >结果:饲养需要直接接触的动物的个体患喘息的比值比(OR)最高(ORdairy = 1.26; OReggs = 1.70)。在农场的家禽数量和牲畜数量上均观察到明显的剂量反应。每天执行兽医程序的农民的OR为1.51。与特应性个体相比,特应性个体中与家禽生产相关的喘息几率更大。每天挤牛奶的奶牛增加所有个体喘息的几率,在特应性哮喘个体中观察到最大的关联。乳制品,家禽和产蛋的影响在吸烟人群中有所不同。过去的吸烟者的几率最高,其次是从不吸烟者,然后是当前的吸烟者。过去的吸烟者中的OReggs为2.88,而从未吸烟者的OReggs只有1.46。当前吸烟者的OReggs为0.80可能反映了吸烟者对暴露的自我选择。 >结论:结果与动物生产和呼吸系统症状一致,表明亚组对暴露的反应可能有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号