首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Heart Journal >Comparison of the acute effects of pacing the atrial septum right atrial appendage coronary sinus os and the latter two sites simultaneously on the duration of atrial activation
【2h】

Comparison of the acute effects of pacing the atrial septum right atrial appendage coronary sinus os and the latter two sites simultaneously on the duration of atrial activation

机译:起搏心房间隔右心耳冠状窦和后两个部位同时起搏对心房激活持续时间的急性作用比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE—To compare the acute effects of right atrial appendage, atrial septal, coronary sinus os, and dual site pacing on the duration of atrial activation.
METHODS—20 patients with a variety of cardiac conditions underwent an intracardiac electrophysiological study. Electrograms were recorded from the right atrial appendage and at multiple sites within the coronary sinus. The duration of atrial activation was measured during pacing at the right atrial appendage, atrial septum, and coronary sinus os, and also during dual site stimulation.
RESULTS—The duration of atrial activation with atrial appendage pacing was notably longer (p < 0.001) than with dual site, septal, or coronary sinus os pacing, but there were no significant differences in atrial activation times between these latter three pacing modes. When stimulating the atria at a cycle length of 500 ms, the mean (SD) duration of atrial activation was 145 (37) ms for right atrial appendage pacing, 93 (26) ms for dual site pacing, 96 (28) ms for septal pacing, and 98 (28) ms for coronary sinus os pacing.
CONCLUSIONS—Assuming that the duration of atrial activation is an important determinant of predisposition to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, atrial septal pacing or coronary sinus os pacing would appear to offer the same advantage as dual site pacing without the additional complexities associated with the latter pacing mode.


>Keywords: atrial septal pacing; dual site pacing; atrial activation; atrial fibrillation
机译:目的—比较右心耳,心房间隔,冠状窦和双位起搏对心房激活持续时间的急性影响。
方法—对20名患有各种心脏疾病的患者进行了心内电生理研究。从右心耳和冠状窦内多个部位记录心电图。在右心耳,心房间隔和冠状窦口的起搏过程中,以及在双部位刺激过程中,都测量了心房激活的持续时间。
结果—心耳起搏的心房激活持续时间明显更长(p <0.001)而不是双位,间隔或冠状动脉窦起搏,但后三种起搏模式之间的房颤激活时间无显着差异。以500毫秒的周期刺激心房时,右心耳起搏的平均(SD)持续时间为145(37)ms,双部位起搏为93(26)ms,间隔为96(28)ms起搏和98(28)ms的冠状动脉窦性起搏。
结论—假设心房激活的持续时间是阵发性心房颤动,心房间隔起搏或冠状窦窦性起搏的重要诱因



>关键字:房间隔起搏;双站点起搏;心房激活心房颤动

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号