首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Public Health >Administrative cases: an effective alternative to lawsuits in assuring access to medicines?
【2h】

Administrative cases: an effective alternative to lawsuits in assuring access to medicines?

机译:行政案件:在确保药品可及性方面,诉讼的有效替代方案?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundAlthough public policy in Brazil supports access to essential medicines, the health system cannot meet all demand. Increasingly, the population has used legal demands to seek access to medicines, an approach that can undermine equitable access by creating policy inconsistencies (e.g., granting access to medicines outside the SUS formulary). In response, the Executive Branch has signed institutional agreements to create an administrative case for submitting requests for medicines directly to the Executive Branch. The objective of this study was to assess the degree to which the administrative cases for requests are in accordance with public policies and guidelines, e.g., if administrative cases results in fewer decisions to purchase outside the SUS formulary.
机译:背景尽管巴西的公共政策支持获取基本药物,但卫生系统无法满足所有需求。人口越来越多地使用法律要求来寻求药品,这种方法会造成政策上的不一致(例如,在SUS配方之外准予使用药品),从而破坏公平获取药品的方法。为此,行政部门签署了机构协议,以创建一个行政案例,直接向行政部门提交药品申请。这项研究的目的是评估行政请求是否符合公共政策和准则的程度,例如,如果行政案件导致在SUS配方之外进行购买的决策较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号