首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Family Practice >Understanding the adoption and use of point-of-care tests in Dutch general practices using multi-criteria decision analysis
【2h】

Understanding the adoption and use of point-of-care tests in Dutch general practices using multi-criteria decision analysis

机译:使用多准则决策分析了解荷兰一般实践中即时检验的采用和使用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe increasing number of available point-of-care (POC) tests challenges clinicians regarding decisions on which tests to use, how to efficiently use them, and how to interpret the results. Although POC tests may offer benefits in terms of low turn-around-time, improved patient’s satisfaction, and health outcomes, only few are actually used in clinical practice. Therefore, this study aims to identify which criteria are, in general, important in the decision to implement a POC test, and to determine their weight. Two POC tests available for use in Dutch general practices (i.e. the C-reactive protein (CRP) test and the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) test) serve as case studies. The information obtained from this study can be used to guide POC test development and their introduction in clinical practice.
机译:背景技术越来越多的可用即时护理(POC)测试向临床医生提出了有关使用哪种测试,如何有效使用它们以及如何解释结果的决策方面的挑战。尽管POC测试可能会带来周转时间短,患者满意度提高和健康结果方面的优势,但实际上很少有临床实践使用。因此,本研究旨在确定一般而言,哪些标准对实施POC测试的决定至关重要,并确定其权重。案例研究使用了两种可用于荷兰通用实践中的POC测试(即C反应蛋白(CRP)测试和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测试)。从这项研究中获得的信息可用于指导POC测试的开发以及将其引入临床实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号