首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BioMed Research International >Light Emitting Diode (LED) Phototherapy versus Conventional Phototherapy in Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia: A Single Blinded Randomized Control Trial from Coastal India
【2h】

Light Emitting Diode (LED) Phototherapy versus Conventional Phototherapy in Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia: A Single Blinded Randomized Control Trial from Coastal India

机译:发光二极管(LED)光疗与常规光疗在新生儿高胆红素血症中的应用:来自印度洋沿岸的单盲随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is a common problem with potentiality to cause irreversible brain damage. Reduction of serum bilirubin level is essential to minimize such damage. Compact fluorescent tubes, halogen bulbs, fiber optic blankets, and LEDs are commonly used light sources for phototherapy with varying efficacies. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of LED versus conventional phototherapy on (a) rate of reduction in total serum bilirubin levels, (b) effect on urinary lumirubin excretion, and (c) comparing side effects of phototherapies among neonates with hyperbilirubinemia. In this randomized control trial, 166 neonates ≥ 35 weeks of age requiring phototherapy were recruited and further divided into 2 groups [LED (83) and conventional (83)] by using computer generated random numbers. Serial total serum bilirubin levels and random urinary lumirubin levels were collected and side effects of phototherapy were noted. Rate of fall in total serum bilirubin levels (TSB, μmol/L/hour) and random urinary lumirubin levels were computed. Data were collected using a pretested proforma. Analysis was done with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 11.5. Independent sample “t” test and Chi-square tests were used with p value of <0.05 being significant. Significant difference was documented in mean rate of decrease of TSB (μmol/L/hour) in LED group (5.3 ± 2.91) when compared to conventional group (3.76 ± 2.39) (p <0.001). A significant increase in mean random urinary lumirubin levels (arbitrary units) was observed in LED group (129.01 ± 33.18) when compared to conventional group (114.44 ± 44.84) (p = 0.021). Side effects were minimal and comparable in both groups. This study concludes the rates of decrease in total serum bilirubin levels and increase in urinary lumirubin levels were significant with LED when compared with conventional phototherapy, implying LED to be more efficacious.
机译:新生儿高胆红素血症是一个常见的问题,有可能引起不可逆的脑损伤。降低血清胆红素水平对于最大限度地减少此类损害至关重要。紧凑型荧光灯管,卤素灯泡,光纤毯和LED通常是具有不同功效的用于光疗的光源。这项研究旨在评估LED与传统光疗对(a)血清总胆红素水平降低的速率,(b)对尿路明红素排泄的影响以及(c)比较高胆红素血症新生儿的光疗副作用的影响。在这项随机对照试验中,招募了166名≥35周龄需要光疗的新生儿,并使用计算机生成的随机数将其分为两组[LED(83)和常规(83)]。收集系列血清总胆红素水平和随机尿鲁米红素水平,并记录光疗的副作用。计算总血清胆红素水平(TSB,μmol/ L /小时)和随机尿鲁米红素水平的下降率。使用预先测试的形式收集数据。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)11.5版进行了分析。使用独立样本“ t”检验和卡方检验,p值<0.05为显着。与传统组(3.76±2.39)相比,LED组TSB的平均降低率(μmol/ L /小时)(5.3±2.91)有显着差异(p <0.001)。与常规组(114.44±44.84)相比,LED组(129.01±33.18)的平均随机尿发光素水平(任意单位)显着增加(p = 0.021)。两组的副作用极小且相当。这项研究得出的结论是,与传统的光疗相比,LED显着降低了血清总胆红素水平的降低速率和尿液中的鲁米红素水平,这表明LED更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号