首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annales de G n ;tique et de S lection Animale >Sensitivity of methods for estimating breeding values using genetic markers to the number of QTL and distribution of QTL variance
【2h】

Sensitivity of methods for estimating breeding values using genetic markers to the number of QTL and distribution of QTL variance

机译:利用遗传标记估算育种价值的方法对QTL数量和QTL方差分布的敏感性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this simulation study was to compare the effect of the number of QTL and distribution of QTL variance on the accuracy of breeding values estimated with genomewide markers (MEBV). Three distinct methods were used to calculate MEBV: a Bayesian Method (BM), Least Angle Regression (LARS) and Partial Least Square Regression (PLSR). The accuracy of MEBV calculated with BM and LARS decreased when the number of simulated QTL increased. The accuracy decreased more when QTL had different variance values than when all QTL had an equal variance. The accuracy of MEBV calculated with PLSR was affected neither by the number of QTL nor by the distribution of QTL variance. Additional simulations and analyses showed that these conclusions were not affected by the number of individuals in the training population, by the number of markers and by the heritability of the trait. Results of this study show that the effect of the number of QTL and distribution of QTL variance on the accuracy of MEBV depends on the method that is used to calculate MEBV.
机译:本模拟研究的目的是比较QTL数量和QTL变异分布对全基因组标记(MEBV)估计的育种值准确性的影响。三种不同的方法用于计算MEBV:贝叶斯方法(BM),最小角度回归(LARS)和偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)。当模拟的QTL数量增加时,用BM和LARS计算的MEBV的准确性降低。当QTL具有不同的方差值时,与所有QTL具有相同方差的情况相比,准确性下降得更多。用PLSR计算的MEBV的准确性既不受QTL数量的影响,也不受QTL方差分布的影响。附加的模拟和分析表明,这些结论不受培训人群中个体数量,标记数量和性状遗传力的影响。这项研究的结果表明,QTL数量和QTL方差分布对MEBV准确性的影响取决于用于计算MEBV的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号