首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Health (New York N.Y. : 1912) >A comparative evaluation of the Scrub and Bass Methods of toothbrushing with flossing as an adjunct (in fifth and sixth graders).
【2h】

A comparative evaluation of the Scrub and Bass Methods of toothbrushing with flossing as an adjunct (in fifth and sixth graders).

机译:对使用牙线作为辅助工具的刷洗和低音牙刷的比较评估(五年级和六年级学生)。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Scrub and Bass Methods of toothbrushing with flossing as an adjunct were evaluated to determine which is most effective in eliminating or reducing plaque and gingivitis in 5th and 6th grade school children. Three hundred and eleven children were randomly selected and placed in five groups (Scrub, Scrub-Floss, Bass, Bass-Floss, Comparison). Four Method groups went through four weeks of daily supervised toothbrushing with four dental hygienists, while the Comparison group received no supervised instructions. There was a marked effect on oral hygiene and gingival conditions at the end of the experimental period in all four groups with no one method superior to another. Peer group intercommunication probably accounts for the improvement in the comparison group.
机译:对使用牙线作为辅助物的牙刷的Scrub和Bass方法进行了评估,以确定哪种方法最能有效消除或减少5年级和6年级儿童的牙菌斑和牙龈炎。随机选择311个孩子,并将其分为五个组(磨砂,磨砂牙线,低音,低音牙线,比较)。四个方法组与四个牙科保健员一起进行了为期四个星期的每日监督牙刷清洁,而比较组未接受任何监督指导。在实验期结束时,所有四组均对口腔卫生和牙龈状况产生显着影响,没有一种方法优于另一种方法。在比较组中,同伴组之间的互通可能是其进步的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号