首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Aesculapian >Is there a place for undergraduate and graduate students in the systematic review process?
【2h】

Is there a place for undergraduate and graduate students in the systematic review process?

机译:在系统的审查过程中本科生和研究生有地方吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Systematic reviews are a well-established and well-honed research methodology in the medical and health sciences fields. As the popularity of systematic reviews has increased, disciplines outside the sciences have started publishing them. This increase in familiarity has begun to trickle down from practitioners and faculty to graduate students and recently undergraduates. The amount of work and rigor that goes into producing a quality systematic review may make these types of research projects seem unattainable for undergraduate or graduate students, but is this an accurate assumption? This commentary discusses whether there is a place for undergraduate and graduate students in the systematic review process. It explains the possible benefits of having undergraduate and graduate students engage in systematic reviews and concludes with ideas for creating basic education or training opportunities for researchers and students who are new to the systematic review process.
机译:系统评价是医学和健康科学领域公认的,完善的研究方法。随着系统评价的流行,科学以外的学科也开始发表它们。熟悉程度的提高已开始从从业人员和教职员工流向研究生和最近的本科生。进行高质量的系统评价所需要进行的大量工作和严格的工作,可能会使这类研究项目对于大学生或研究生而言似乎无法实现,但这是一个正确的假设吗?这篇评论讨论了在系统的审查过程中是否存在大学生和研究生的地方。它解释了让本科生和研究生进行系统评价的可能好处,并以为基础的系统评价过程中不熟悉的研究人员和学生创造基础教育或培训机会的想法作为结束。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 The Aesculapian
  • 作者

    Christina L. Wissinger;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 2018(106),2
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 248–250
  • 总页数 3
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号