首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Aesculapian >Oral History and the Medical Librarian
【2h】

Oral History and the Medical Librarian

机译:口述史与医学馆员

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In recent years there has been an increasing interest in the “oral history,” as a technique for creating records or source materials for medical historians. The unique aspects of this technique include the ability to supplement the written record with candid commentary, to create a record or collection of information about an individual or a specific subject area in those instances where a prior record does not exist, and to capture a sample of the personality of the person being interviewed by preservation of the tape recording.There is a lack of unanimity regarding the definition, limits, and goals of oral history. Some individuals insist that the oral historian must in fact be a trained historian and deplore the thought of librarians utilizing this technique.It is the feeling of the author that the interviewer's professional “label” is frequently unimportant, if that individual has prepared himself adequately for the interview. The ideal set of circumstances which combines the oral history memoir with the acquisition and review of the respondent's papers can be handled well by the librarian with the interest and time to conduct such a program.There is general agreement that the time has come when reasonable standards for this technique must be developed if the various programs are to command the interest and respect of those who will use these increasing collections of data. On a more practical level, it is only natural that those who are asked to provide financial support for oral history programs will demand evidence of attention to some sort of standards.
机译:近年来,作为一种为医学史学家创建记录或原始资料的技术,人们对“口述历史”越来越感兴趣。该技术的独特之处在于能够用坦率的注释来补充书面记录,在不存在先前记录的情况下创建有关个人或特定主题领域的信息记录或信息收集,以及捕获样本通过保留录音带来确定被采访者的性格。关于口述历史的定义,范围和目标缺乏一致意见。有些人坚持认为,口头历史学家实际上必须是受过训练的历史学家,并且对利用这种技术的图书馆员的思想表示遗憾。作者感到,如果访问者的专业“标签”经常为个人做好充分准备,那他就常常不重要。面试。图书馆员可以根据口述历史回忆录与对被访者的论文的获取和审阅相结合的理想情况,并有兴趣和时间来进行这样的程序。人们普遍认为,合理的标准已经到来了如果要使用各种程序来吸引那些将使用这些不断增长的数据收集的人们的兴趣和尊重,则必须开发这种技术。在更实际的水平上,被要求为口述历史计划提供财务支持的人自然会要求注意某些标准的证据。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 The Aesculapian
  • 作者

    Peter D. Olch;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 1969(57),1
  • 年度 1969
  • 页码 1–4
  • 总页数 4
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 16:30:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号