首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AAPS PharmSci >Regulatory Considerations for Approval of Generic Inhalation Drug Products in the US EU Brazil China and India
【2h】

Regulatory Considerations for Approval of Generic Inhalation Drug Products in the US EU Brazil China and India

机译:美国欧盟巴西中国和印度批准仿制药吸入性药物的监管注意事项

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article describes regulatory approaches for approval of “generic” orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs) in the United States, European Union, Brazil, China and India. While registration of a generic OIDP in any given market may require some documentation of the formulation and device similarity to the “original” product as well as comparative testing of in vitro characteristics and in vivo performance, the specific documentation approaches, tests and acceptance criteria vary by the country. This divergence is due to several factors, including unique cultural, historical, legal and economic circumstances of each region; the diverse healthcare and regulatory systems; the different definitions of key terms such as “generic” and “reference” drug; the acknowledged absence of in vitro in vivo correlations for OIDPs; and the scientific and statistical issues related to OIDP testing (such as how best to account for the batch-to-batch variability of the Reference product, whether to use average bioequivalence or population bioequivalence in the statistical analysis of results, whether to use healthy volunteers or patients for pharmacokinetic studies, and which pharmacodynamic or clinical end-points should be used). As a result of this discrepancy, there are ample opportunities for the regulatory and scientific communities around the world to collaborate in developing more consistent, better aligned, science-based approaches. Moving in that direction will require both further research and further open discussion of the pros and cons of various approaches.
机译:本文介绍了在美国,欧盟,巴西,中国和印度批准“仿制”口服吸入药物产品(OIDP)的监管方法。虽然在任何给定的市场上注册通用OIDP可能都需要一些与“原始”产品相似的配方和设备证明文件,以及体外特性和体内性能的对比测试,但具体的文件记录方法,测试和接受标准有所不同由国家。这种差异是由于多种因素造成的,包括每个地区独特的文化,历史,法律和经济状况;多样化的医疗保健和监管系统;关键术语的不同定义,例如“非专利”和“参考”药物;公认的OIDPs缺乏体外体内相关性;以及与OIDP测试相关的科学和统计问题(例如,如何最好地考虑参考产品的批次间差异,如何在结果的统计分析中使用平均生物等效性或群体生物等效性,是否使用健康志愿者)或进行药代动力学研究的患者,以及应使用哪些药效学或临床终点)。由于这种差异,世界各地的监管机构和科学界都有足够的机会合作开发更一致,更统一,基于科学的方法。朝这个方向发展将需要进一步研究和进一步公开讨论各种方法的利弊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号