首页> 外文期刊>世界针灸杂志(英文版) >激光针刀结合针灸治疗椎动脉型颈椎病临床研究
【24h】

激光针刀结合针灸治疗椎动脉型颈椎病临床研究

机译:激光针刀结合针灸治疗椎动脉型颈椎病临床研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

目的:对比激光针刀结合针灸与药物治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的临床疗效;方法:将门诊88例椎动脉型颈椎病患者以单盲法分为治疗组48例(以激光针刀结合针灸治疗),药物对照组40例(以复方丹参静滴和西比灵口服),治疗前两组病例经统计学分析无差异性,观察对比两组治疗效果;结果:激光针刀结合针灸治疗组治愈率60.42%,总有效率97.92%,药物对照组治愈率30%,总有效率87.5%;经统计学分析,P<0.05,二者疗效有显著差异性.结论:激光针刀结合针灸治疗椎动脉型颈椎病疗效明显优于药物治疗组,值得临床推广.%Objective To compare the effect of laser needle-knife and acupuncture with medication for vertebral-artery-type cervical spondylosis (CSA). Methods The 88 outpatients of CSA were divided with single-blind method into Treatment Group (treated by laser needle-knife and acupuncture) with 48 patients in it and Control Group (treated by Intravenous drip of Compound Salvia Miltiorrhiza Injection and oral taking of Flunarizine (Sibelium) with 40 patients in it. Before the treatment, the two groups were without difference statistically. Results In the treatment group, the curative rate was 60.42% and the total effective rate 97.92%. In the control group, the curative rate was 30% and the total effective rate 87.5%. In statistics, P<0.05, a significant difference existed between the two groups. Conclusion The effect of laser needle-knife and acupuncture for CSA is obviously better than that of medication, worth spreading.
机译:目的:对比激光针刀结合针灸与药物治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的临床疗效;方法:将门诊88例椎动脉型颈椎病患者以单盲法分为治疗组48例(以激光针刀结合针灸治疗),药物对照组40例(以复方丹参静滴和西比灵口服),治疗前两组病例经统计学分析无差异性,观察对比两组治疗效果;结果:激光针刀结合针灸治疗组治愈率60.42%,总有效率97.92%,药物对照组治愈率30%,总有效率87.5%;经统计学分析,P<0.05,二者疗效有显着差异性.结论:激光针刀结合针灸治疗椎动脉型颈椎病疗效明显优于药物治疗组,值得临床推广.%Objective To compare the effect of laser needle-knife and acupuncture with medication for vertebral-artery-type cervical spondylosis (CSA). Methods The 88 outpatients of CSA were divided with single-blind method into Treatment Group (treated by laser needle-knife and acupuncture) with 48 patients in it and Control Group (treated by Intravenous drip of Compound Salvia Miltiorrhiza Injection and oral taking of Flunarizine (Sibelium) with 40 patients in it . Before the treatment, the two groups were without difference statistically. Results In the treatment group, the curative rate was 60.42% and the total effective rate 97.92%. In the control group, the curative rate was 30% and the total effective rate 87.5 %. In statistics, P<0.05, a signific ant difference existed between the two groups. Conclusion The effect of laser needle-knife and acupuncture for CSA is obviously better than that of medication, worth spreading.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号