According to the panel data of 11 provinces in the west part of China during 1998-2011 , the industrial environment efficiency and the economic efficiency of each province in the west part of China are measured by DEA-SBM Model and DEA-CCR Model , and the results show that DEA-SBM Model better solves unexpected output problem, that the industrial environment efficiency measured by DEA-SBM Model is more objective and practical than the economic efficiency measured by DEA-CCR Model , that the industry in the west part of China does not reach the optimal production frontier , that the difference between the industrial environment efficiency and the economic efficiency in the west part of China gradually narrows during 1998-2007 but enlarges during 2007-2011 , that there is regional difference in the influence of environment pollution on the industrial environment efficiency of each province in the west part of China , among which , there is big difference between the industrial environment efficiency and the economic efficiency in Inner Mongolia , Shaanxi , Qinghai and Ningxia , and there is low coordination degree between industry and environment .The west part of China should accelerate the change of industrial growth mode , optimize industrial transfer , reasonably allocate the resources and mitigate the contradiction between industry and environment .%根据1998-2011年的面板数据，运用DEA-SBM模型和DEA-CCR模型测度我国西部11个省区的工业环境效率和经济效率，结果表明：DEA-SBM模型较好地处理了非期望产出问题，测度的工业环境效率比DEA-CCR模型测度的工业经济效率更客观、真实；我国西部工业没有达到最佳的生产前沿；西部地区工业环境效率与经济效率的差距在1998-2007年逐渐缩小，但在2007-2011年有所扩大；环境污染对西部各省区的工业环境效率影响具有地区差异，其中，内蒙古、陕西、青海、宁夏四省区工业环境效率与经济效率的差距较大，工业与环境的协调度也较低。西部地区应加快转变工业增长方式，优化产业转移，合理配置资源，缓解工业与环境的矛盾。
展开▼
