论渎职罪的罪数问题--解读《两高关于办理渎职刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释（一）》

摘要

When the third article of the Judicial Interpretation of the Malfeasance Crime of the Supreme Court and the Supreme ProcuratorateⅠis applied for bribery and malfeasance crimes, in order to avoid double evaluation, bribery should not be used as the"favoritism"plot in the crime of malfeasance for severer punishment. And the act of malfeasance and the serious consequences it caused shouldn't be seen as"seeking interests for others"or"the serious circumstances"in the bribery crime. When the forth article is applied to determine the number of crimes in the situation where the malfeasance crime involves the accomplice of other crimes, the special regulation of the malfeasance crime, the theory of accomplice and the jurisprudence of imaginative joinder should be considered to-gether. Besides, the theory of"obligation offenses"should be applied to the determination of several crimes.%针对《两高关于办理渎职刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释（一）》，在适用第3条对受贿罪和渎职罪并罚时，为避免双重评价，受贿行为不应再作为渎职罪中的“徇私”情节从重或加重处罚；受贿罪中的“为他人谋取利益”及“情节严重”之认定，也不应再以渎职犯罪行为及其严重后果为依据。渎职罪牵涉到其他犯罪的共犯的，在适用解释第4条对其罪数问题进行分析、认定时，需将渎职罪专章规定的特殊性与共犯理论、想象竞合的法理结合在一起考虑，并在职务行为和非职务的参与行为之数行为的认定中，应用义务犯之法理。