首页> 中文期刊> 《社会保障研究》 >职业福利功能之争

职业福利功能之争

         

摘要

对职业福利功能的判断或定位,决定了在职业福利发展及其与公共福利的合作机制方面的政府政策引导方向、力度、方式或方法。国内外学者对本国或世界范围内公共福利与职业福利作用关系的实际考察发现:补充理论、替代理论和福利多元主义理论对职业福利的功能做出了不同的判断。由于对各福利供给主体功能等价原则以及国家之外的福利供给主体对国家的替代能力的质疑,替代理论和福利多元主义理论缺少广泛支持;对公共福利的补充功能成为世界范围内职业福利的功能定位。然而,职业福利本身具有高度复杂性,要使职业福利充分发挥补充功能,仍需对其本身进行深入研究。%The functional judgment or positioning of occupational welfare determines the direction,strength and ways or methods of public policies in occupational welfare development,and its cooperation mechanism with public welfare. Scholars at home and abroad study their own or world countries within the scope of public welfare and occupational welfare function relationship,find that the complementary theory,substitution theory and the welfare pluralism theory have made a different judgment to the function of the occupational welfare. However,due to the functional equivalence principle of various welfare suppliers and the ability of welfare supplies besides the state to replace the government on the aspect of welfare supply,substitution theory and the welfare pluralism theory lack wide support. Therefore,supplementary function theory becomes the functional orientation of occupational welfare worldwide. Nevertheless,to give full play to supplementary function,occupational welfare still needs to be further studied as itself with high complexity.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号