不同进针法针刺内关穴对简式 McGill 疼痛问卷表评分及心血管功能的影响

摘要

Objective To observe the changes of cardiovascular function after acupuncture at Neiguan (PC 6) respectively with slowly twirling needling and tube needling in healthy subjects, and to objectively evaluate the pain intensity of the two needling methods.Method A hundred healthy young subjects were randomized into group A and group B, 50 cases in each group. Neiguan (PC 6) point was selected for acupuncture in both groups. In the first stage, group A received acupuncture by slowly twirling needling, while group B received acupuncture with tube needling; in the second stage (a week later), group A received acupuncture with tube needling, while group B by slowly twirling needling. The Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) was observed after acupuncture for each subject, and ZXG-E automatic cardiovascular function detector was adopted to evaluate the cardiovascular function before puncturing, 5 min after puncturing, and 30 min after puncturing.Result The Sensory Pain Rating Index (S-PRI) and total SF-MPQ scores of slowly twirling needling were significantly different from that of tube needling (P<0.01). The Affective Pain Rating Index (A-PRI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Present Pain Intensity (PPI) of slowly twirling needling method were significantly different from that of tube needling (P<0.01). At 5 min after needle insertion, the FEK and VER values of twirling needling were significantly different from that of tube needling (P<0.01).Conclusion The pain produced by slowly twirling needling is more variant and stronger than that by tube needling, and this pain variation can produce a positive effect on cardiovascular function.%目的：观察缓慢捻进针法与管针进针法针刺内关穴后健康人心血管功能状态的变化,客观评价缓慢捻进针法与管针进针法的疼痛程度。方法将100例健康青年人随机分为A组和B组,每组50例。两组均取内关穴,第一阶段A组采用缓慢捻进针法针刺,B组采用管针进针法针刺；第二阶段(1星期后)A组采用管针进针法针刺,B组采用缓慢捻进针法针刺。所有受试者针刺后均采用简式McGill疼痛问卷表进行评分,并用ZXG-E型自动心血管功能测试诊断仪检测受试者进针前、进针后5 min及进针后30 min的心血管功能情况。结果缓慢捻进针法针刺后PRI感觉项总分与简式McGill疼痛问卷表总分与管针进针法比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。缓慢捻进针法针刺后PRI情感项总分、VAS评分及PPI评分与管针进针法比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。缓慢捻进针法进针后5 min FEK和VER与管针进针法比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。结论缓慢捻进针法所产生的各类疼痛感觉明显多且强于管针进针法,这种疼痛差异对心血管功能具有良性影响。