跨门类论文学术影响力评价方法可行性研究

摘要

为实现对不同研究领域甚至不同科学门类间论文学术影响力更为公正的评价,建立由8个指标组成的综合评价体系,并以诺贝尔奖获奖者的代表性论文为参比论文,验证该综合评价体系的客观性和可行性.结果表明,该多指标综合评价指标体系的因子分析法评价值F及其标化值F’在不同门类间比较时较他引量更具合理性,并且能增强具有高学术影响力特征的参比论文的显示度.%To realize more impartial assessment of academic influence of natural science papers across research fields or e-ven scientific disciplines, the paper constructed a comprehensive evaluation system consisting of eight indices, and it adopted the representative articles of laureates of the Nobel Prize as benchmark to verify the objectivity and justice of the system. The result showed that F value and F'value obtained through factor analysis of the multidimensional comprehensive evaluation system were more reasonable than other - citaiton, as well as raised the visibility of high impact papers when applied to comparison of articles across scientific disciplines.