Objective To use and develop medical resources. Methods The qualities of Saposhnikoviae Radix from the wild, the transplant, the direct sow and the bolting were evaluated by pharmacology. The antipyretic, analgesia and anti-inflammatory activity was determined using rectal temperature, acetic acid-induced writhing response and ear swelling test respectively. Results The pharuacological effects of the bolting hadn't decreased, the transplant considered as the lowest quality was as much as the wild with high quality, the direct sow was of poor quality. Conclusion The transplant was novelty, and would not apply to traditional method. The appraisal of root from Saposhnikovia divaricata should be made more by the chromes and less by the appearance. The outdated prejudices should be given up with respect to the cultivated.%目的 对不同类型的栽培防风的质量进行药理学评价,以期合理地开发、利用栽培的防风资源.方法 与野生防风的药理作用进行比较研究,解热作用采用2,4-二硝基苯酚致热法、镇痛作用采用扭体法、抗炎作用采用小鼠耳肿胀法.结果 抽薹防风的药理活性并未降低；栽培的移栽防风的药理活性达到野生防风水平,质量较好,而直播防风质量最差.结论 传统的单纯以外观性状评价栽培防风药材质量缺乏科学依据.
展开▼
