首页> 中文期刊>中国医疗前沿 >复方曲安奈德尿素软膏和复方氟米松软膏治疗湿疹皮炎类皮肤病临床疗效对比

复方曲安奈德尿素软膏和复方氟米松软膏治疗湿疹皮炎类皮肤病临床疗效对比

     

摘要

目的:探讨复方曲安奈德尿素软膏和复方氟米松软膏治疗湿疹皮炎类皮肤病的临床疗效。方法将我院2011年1月-2011年10月86例湿疹皮炎类皮肤病患者随机分为两组各43例,治疗组采用复方氟米松软膏治疗,对照组采用复方曲安奈德尿素软膏治疗,比较两组临床疗效。结果治疗组总有效率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)、不良反应发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论复方氟米松软膏治疗湿疹皮炎类皮肤病相比复方曲安奈德尿素软膏疗效更为显著,患者预后更好,值得临床推广。%Objective To explore the clinical effect of compound triamcinolone acetonide urea ointment and compound flumetasone ointment in the treatment of skin disorders such as dermatitis eczema. Methods Our hospital in January 2011-October 2011 treated 86 cases of patients with skin diseases like eczema and dermatitis were selected as research subjects,which were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group were treated with compound flumetasone ointment. The control group were treated with compound triamcinolone acetonide urea ointment. Compared the clinical efficacy of two treatment methods. Results The total effectiveness of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group;the incidence of adverse reactions in treatment group patients was significantly lower than that in control group, and there was statistical significance(P<0.05). Conclusion Compound flumetasone ointment has more remarkable curative effect than compound triamcinolone acetonide urea ointment in the treatment of skin disorders such as dermatitis eczema, and it is worthy of clinical application.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号