Objective To compare the cooling effect of ice compressing using the ice-bag packed by immobilization bag with that using the traditional way. Methods Choose 80 hyperpyretic patients who need ice compressing randomly. These ones were averagely and randomly divided into two groups: the observation group and the control group. Put the ice-bag into the self-designed immobilization bag in observation group and into the wrap as the schoolbook described in the control group, and then place it in the needed position for ice compressing. Results The nursing time was 4.50±2.40 minutes in the observation group while it was 15.52±9.54 minutes in the control group. Otherwise, the cooling effect of the observation group was obviously better than that of the control group. Conclusion Ice compressing with the ice-bag packed by immobilization bag was economical with time and effort, and it improved our nursing's efficiency with the cooling aim fulfilled.%目的 比较应用冰袋固定袋和应用传统的冰敷方法 对高热患者进行降温的效果.方法 选择高热需要冰敷的病人80例,随机分成观察组40例和对照组40例,观察组把冰袋装进自行设计的冰袋固定袋中进行冰敷;对照组采用教科书上的方法 将冰袋装入套内,置于所需部位.结果 观察组需要直接护理时间是(4.50±2.4)min;对照组需要直接护理时间是(15.52±9.54)min,而且观察组降温效果明显优于对照组.结论 应用冰袋固定袋进行冰敷降温省力省时,既提高了护理人员的工作效率,又达到降温的目的 .
展开▼
