Objective To study the situation of fatigue and its relationship with coping style in flight personnel. Methods Five hundred and fifty nine flight personnel were evaluated by fatigue assessment instrument (FAI) and trait coping style questionnaire (TCSQ). Data were analyzed with SPSS 15. 0. Results The severity of fatigue in flight personnel had no statistical significance between the healthy group, but was significantly lower than the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) group (P <0. 01). There was statistical significance a-mong helicopters, transports,fighters, bombers in the severity of fatigue (P <0. 01) and situation-specificity (P< 0. 01) of FAI. The severity of fatigue in bombers was higher than in fighters, the situation-specificity in bombers was higher than in transports. There was statistical significance among pilots, navigators, correspondent, mechanics in the situation-specificity(P <0. 01) of FAI,the situation-specificity in mechanics was lower than other professionals. The severity of fatigue in flight personnel was negatively correlated with positive coping ( r =- 0. 19) and positively correlated with negative coping (r =0. 41) . Conclusion Conditions and characteristics of fatigue were closely correlated with coping style in flight personnel.%目的 探讨飞行人员疲劳状况及其与应对方式的相关性.方法 用疲劳评定量表(FAI)和特质应对方式问卷( TCSQ)对559名飞行人员进行量表测评,数据采用SPSS15.0软件包进行统计分析.结果 飞行人员在疲劳的严重程度上与健康组比较差异无统计学意义,而明显低于慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)组(P＜0.01)；不同战机飞行人员在疲劳的严重程度(P＜0.01)和情境特异性(P＜0.01)方面差异具有统计学意义,其中轰炸机人员的疲劳程度显著高于歼击机人员,情境特异性显著高于运输机人员；不同专业飞行人员在情境特异性方面差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.01),其中机械师在疲劳的情境特异性方面明显偏低；飞行人员疲劳的严重程度与积极应对方式呈显著负相关(r=-0.19),与消极应对方式呈显著正相关(r=0.41).结论 飞行人员疲劳状况及特点与应对方式密切相关.
展开▼
